National League Rugby Discussion Forum Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > League Rugby - www.leaguerugby.co.uk > Clubhouse chat
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Sell all the RFU's assets to the highest bidder
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

IMPORTANT Remember to read the rules of the board and abide by them when posting.

Sell all the RFU's assets to the highest bidder

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
Author
Message
Big Eddie View Drop Down
World Cup Winner
World Cup Winner
Avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 5045
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Big Eddie Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Sell all the RFU's assets to the highest bidder
    Posted: 09 Jan 2024 at 16:37
Under another thread in Clubhouse Chat I posted a reply to Richard Lowther setting out how I would engage with all 2,000 Community Clubs to prompt action to cleanse the 'rotten borough' that is the RFU. I have reproduced my post in italics below:

I believe that it is time to uncouple the 10 Premiership Clubs and the rest of the elite game from the 2,000 or so other Community Clubs. All 2,000 Community clubs own the RFU but most of the RFU's resources are directed to the elite game and the 10 Premiership clubs.

The interests of the 10 Premiership shareholders and the elite game are vastly different and the RFU is no longer looking after the majority but only the tiny minority.

Dissolve the RFU by selling all its assets and distributing the proceeds proportionately. The numbers and rationale make perfect sense


As at June 23 Twickenham is sitting in the books of the RFU at a value of some £250m and the RFU has total net assets of £283m

On the basis that I believe King Billy could sell out Twickenham to CVC and divert the cash to the elite game and the Premiership here is my alternative.

1. Member clubs put forward a resolution to sell Twickenham and the rest of the RFU's assets to the highest bidder - after settling creditors and on the basis it currently isn't a forced sale I expect the pot to be considerably north of £1 billion (10 x 2023 Operating profit of £103m before Rugby Investment)

2. The £1 billion is distributed proportionately to Member clubs - say £500k each

3. The Premiership clubs each get £500k as do the Community Clubs

4. King Billy and CVC look after the running of the Elite game and the Premiership.

5. The Community Clubs set up their own organisation which is likely to comprise the handful of people that the RFU previously employed to look after the Community Game

This should happen because otherwise all the underlying assets that in reality belong to the Member clubs will be syphoned off to the uninvestable Premiership.

In any corporate situation where the interests of the shareholders were so diverse......a sale of the assets or the body corporate would be an obvious solution. It is radical but having considered most of the other scenarios I have concluded that any other course of action would just be tinkering and would not address the fundamental issue.

My concern if this radical course of action isn't undertaken is that the 2,000 or so Community Clubs will only see a few crumbs from King Billy's table as most of the resources are syphoned off to the Premiership and CVC. This way each Community Club will get its fair share of the RFU's net assets which will be an equitable outcome.

This would go to a vote of the clubs at an AGM or a Special General Meeting....two thirds would need to approve so checks and balances in place 

This can be done and should be done!



Edited by Big Eddie - 09 Jan 2024 at 16:46
''The future isn't what it used to be''
Back to Top
Berksrugby View Drop Down
First XV squad
First XV squad


Joined: 18 Apr 2023
Location: Not given
Status: Offline
Points: 43
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Berksrugby Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Jan 2024 at 17:50
Big Eddie, or should I say Comrade Red Eddie?! I'm only joking, but I have followed these forum topics around the RFU and their plans for Premiership 2 with interest.

No one can fault your clear passion and enthusiasm in opposing the way in which the RFU are running the game, but I'm afraid the suggestion you put forward here is absurd. Coups rarely end well, and there are far too many nuances between clubs in the Community Game (which are those at Level 6/7 and below in reality where no players are paid/enticed/sponsored etc) to simply divvy up £500k each.

A fairly local example of this for me would be between Reading RFC, who run 3 men's teams (Levels 6 - 9), vets, ladies, minis to colts (boys and girls) mixed ability (special needs) and walking rugby teams who, under your plan, would receive the same amount as Berkshire Shire Hall, who play 20 yards away on a neighbouring pitch, but who are a seperate club and run a single men's team at Level 9. 

As you can see, the rugby landscape is so varied and I'm sure this example would be replicated all over the country. How do you actually determine who gets what and under what criteria? A logistical, and even ethical nightmare.
I'm afraid that this is just one flaw of your vision that jumped out at me right away, before I even give thought to the remainder of the proposals. 

I see that you are a Caldy supporter, and so watch Championship rugby. As a passing thought, how do you imagine some of your opponents, the likes of Ealing or Doncaster, as aspiring Premiership-quality outfits, would take to your proposals. Given that they employ full time professional players and staff in the same way that the demonised Premiership clubs do. Again, where do you draw the line.
Back to Top
FHLH View Drop Down
World Cup Winner
World Cup Winner
Avatar
Cambridge

Joined: 19 Apr 2009
Location: Cambridge
Status: Offline
Points: 5406
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote FHLH Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Jan 2024 at 17:56
I concur but there may be the residual contractual liability of losses from participating in 6N, WC and Autumn Internationals.

The other issue is that the armed forces regiments and Oxford/Cambridge are also members.

It would cause chaos in the players market as the community game is levelled with equally funded player salaries and then has clubs going under once they've spent their pot of gold.

Bonus is freedom from RFU and CVC. Perhaps also implementation of transfer fees up into good ship CVC

Having said all this, it's a great idea.
"My father told me big men fall just as quick as little ones, if you put a sword through their hearts."
Back to Top
Richard Lowther View Drop Down
Coaching staff
Coaching staff
Avatar
Moderator

Joined: 19 May 2007
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 6592
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Richard Lowther Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Jan 2024 at 18:17
Twickenham is the RFUs cash cow.
You don't sell your major money making assets without a plan to replace them cheaper but still maintain the same if not higher income. *
If you were proposing selling to rebuild bigger and better ** elsewhere, outside of London, then I could understand your plan but as it stands it is pure madness. 

You would leave the future game having to hire, at great expense, future venues and with none of the ancillary revenue; you would leave the game in the hands of TV men hidden behind a pay wall, withering away from the general public that you need to attract for the future

The last thing I would do is give clubs £500,000. I suspect it would be spent tomorrow with nothing to show for it long term. Every player would scramble for a pay day, every charlatan would be looking for a pay out. 

We've seen this when clubs sell grounds and use the revenue to try and buy success and then struggle to find a new home better than what they've given up. We would see members cash out with no thought for future generations. 

It would kill the game that you are trying to protect. 

* The FA briefly considered selling Wembley and then came to their senses. 

** Football even with billions of TV revenue realises the importance of owning a ground and match day income, that's why the rebuild to include corporate hospitality, ie at the new Tottenham Ground


Edited by Richard Lowther - 09 Jan 2024 at 18:46
Moderator National League Rugby Message Boards



Remember Wakefield RFC
Back to Top
Big Eddie View Drop Down
World Cup Winner
World Cup Winner
Avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 5045
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Big Eddie Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Jan 2024 at 18:20
Berksrugby,

What is happening at the moment is that 10 Premiership Clubs are getting the majority of RFU resources and will almost certainly continue to do so at the expense of the Community Clubs......who are likely to get nothing or virtually nothing from the RFU ......ever!

Each club (Community or Premiership) have a single share in the RFU......there will be perceived winners and losers amongst the Community Clubs as they will all get the same payout....but it is likely to measure in the £ hundreds of thousands for each club.

The Rules of the RFU and its ownership will proscribe how the proceeds will be divided.....and it will be almost certainly proportionate to shareholding.......just as it should be, not just 10 shareholders scooping up the majority of the resources.

I have no regard for the Premiership clubs, they are owned by very,very rich individuals and have received most of the RFU's money for the last 20 years.......if it is such a great business and such a great investment CVC can bankroll them and let the Community Game get on with what the RFU should have been all about.

Just to provide a little context I am a Chartered Accountant and a Corporate Financier.....I have been advising on and managing such transactions for the last 30 years... generally in the £10s of millions not the £100s of millions (except for one international deal which was of such a size as this transaction could be ).

Big deals such as this are made to work because :

i) It makes real sense for such a transaction as each group of shareholders are freed up to pursue their differing strategic objectives

ii) There is enough in it to galvanise and motivate a very substantial number of small shareholders

iii) the fees  for the lawyers, corporate financiers and accountants are very big and the best firms want to get involved.

Trust me Berksrugby...this could happen!
''The future isn't what it used to be''
Back to Top
Paul10 View Drop Down
World Cup Winner
World Cup Winner


Joined: 24 Mar 2023
Location: Milton Keynes
Status: Offline
Points: 736
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Paul10 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Jan 2024 at 19:04
Would the Twickenham debenture holders not have a say?

There was a big number for them in the latest rfu financials.
Back to Top
Berksrugby View Drop Down
First XV squad
First XV squad


Joined: 18 Apr 2023
Location: Not given
Status: Offline
Points: 43
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Berksrugby Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Jan 2024 at 19:23
I'm afraid none of the above has persuaded me, the whole idea is for the birds. Its a utopian fantasy, which if ever allowed to pass, would see the decimation of rugby union in this country beyond repair (and certainly beyond the tribulations currently facing the game). 

As the other poster pointed out quite rightly, several 100's of clubs would take the handout and run, with their clubs going under a short time later when the freebie ran out, mismanaged by clubmen who, although well intentioned, on the whole would squander such an amount of capital chasing short term glory. In no small part, unlike yourself as an accountant and numbers man, because they lack a grasp of financial common sense and business acumen.

I'm talking about the sorts of chairman, treasurers, presidents that harbour aspirations of elevating their club 'up the ladder' to fulfil their dreams and, in some cases, massage their egos in the community - I've seen it before, and it can have long lasting negative effects on players, coaches, and the whole fabric of a rugby club.

Like was also mentioned by someone, your idea would erode the actual community game (which in the truest sense is actually some way below the Championship), and in 5 to 10 years time you would have yet more land (formerly pitches 1 - 3 at 'Old Farts RFC') sold off to property developers to build more houses/flats that no one asked for.

This is not a realistic and progressive vision for rugby union in England that I can entertain, if only for the sake of the fact that I would like my grandchildren to actually still have a local club in existence to play at in the next few years.
Back to Top
rugbychris View Drop Down
British and Irish Lion
British and Irish Lion


Joined: 02 May 2019
Location: London
Status: Offline
Points: 163
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote rugbychris Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 Jan 2024 at 06:57
Very interesting and well thought out idea Big Eddie. Perhaps clubs could  receive a portion of their money each season and it is ringfenced for game development?

Berksrugby seems to encapsulate the thinking at HQ. Let the thousands of volunteers at the lower levels of the game work tirelessly to promote, manage and develop the game throughout the country but be sure to keep them in their box because a little funding will mean the egotistical, inept and over ambitious clubman from the low reaches of the game will destroy rugby as we know it. P.S. please keep on buying tickets to Twickenham though
Back to Top
Berksrugby View Drop Down
First XV squad
First XV squad


Joined: 18 Apr 2023
Location: Not given
Status: Offline
Points: 43
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Berksrugby Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 Jan 2024 at 08:28
Interesting and well thought out idea?! It is madness, pure and simple.

Have you taken leave of your senses rugbychris? Then again, who isn't partial to a free handout now and then.

LOL


Back to Top
Robb View Drop Down
World Cup Winner
World Cup Winner
Avatar

Joined: 24 Jan 2017
Location: South East
Status: Offline
Points: 1562
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Robb Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 Jan 2024 at 08:32
We need to get rid of the caretakers, not sell off the family silver!
Back to Top
Big Eddie View Drop Down
World Cup Winner
World Cup Winner
Avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 5045
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Big Eddie Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 Jan 2024 at 09:16
Originally posted by Berksrugby Berksrugby wrote:

I'm afraid none of the above has persuaded me, the whole idea is for the birds. Its a utopian fantasy, which if ever allowed to pass, would see the decimation of rugby union in this country beyond repair (and certainly beyond the tribulations currently facing the game). 

As the other poster pointed out quite rightly, several 100's of clubs would take the handout and run, with their clubs going under a short time later when the freebie ran out, mismanaged by clubmen who, although well intentioned, on the whole would squander such an amount of capital chasing short term glory. In no small part, unlike yourself as an accountant and numbers man, because they lack a grasp of financial common sense and business acumen.

I'm talking about the sorts of chairman, treasurers, presidents that harbour aspirations of elevating their club 'up the ladder' to fulfil their dreams and, in some cases, massage their egos in the community - I've seen it before, and it can have long lasting negative effects on players, coaches, and the whole fabric of a rugby club.

Like was also mentioned by someone, your idea would erode the actual community game (which in the truest sense is actually some way below the Championship), and in 5 to 10 years time you would have yet more land (formerly pitches 1 - 3 at 'Old Farts RFC') sold off to property developers to build more houses/flats that no one asked for.

This is not a realistic and progressive vision for rugby union in England that I can entertain, if only for the sake of the fact that I would like my grandchildren to actually still have a local club in existence to play at in the next few years.

Berksrugby,

Your arguments do not stand up to scrutiny when you compare it to the status quo:

1. The Community game is currently dying on its feet as many 'sides' fold for lack of numbers. How many clubs now run 4 senior sides as used to be the case 20 or so years ago. I  don't know of many in the North West and I expect it to be the same across the country

2. Currently an unelected RFU board led by an unelected King Billy direct virtually all of the RFU's resources (which are effectively owned by the 2,000 rugby clubs throughout England) to a very tiny majority (about 0.05%)

3. You rubbish the character of progressive club Chairmen, Treasurers  and Presidents painting them as charlatans who will waste the resources provided to their clubs by the dissolution of the RFU. How patronising. 

The Community game is withering on the vine and is being starved of investment by King Billy and his courtiers. Far better to distribute the resources fairly and proportionately whilst there are still resources available and let the Community game reset itself under new leadership solely focussed on the Community game

4. I believe in the right of the clubs to democratically decide how to utilise the RFU's resources rather than let King Billy and his unelected board direct all of the RFU's resources towards the elite game and just 10 clubs

For those who say how outrageous to suggest selling off the family silver, you are mistaken. The family silver is producing no return for the circa 2,000 Community clubs. The returns are going to the elite game and the Premiership and to pay King Billy's salary.

Let CVC buy Twickenham and the rest of the RFU's assets (If they are the highest bidder) and return the proceeds to the 99.9% of shareholders being the Community clubs. Twickenham and its returns can then provide for the Elite game and the Premiership and the Community Game can provide for itself.

Is this a more outrageous idea then letting King Billy and his unelected courtiers reign over the dissolution of English Club rugby by stealth?


Edited by Big Eddie - 10 Jan 2024 at 09:37
''The future isn't what it used to be''
Back to Top
Camquin View Drop Down
World Cup Winner
World Cup Winner
Avatar

Joined: 01 Jun 2007
Location: Cambridge
Status: Offline
Points: 11408
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Camquin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 Jan 2024 at 09:43
The problem is that without the TV contract for internationals, there is no income.
IF you split the sport, the professional game will take all of that.

And the game does need some administration.
As do all the things that the RFU is not currently doing, like marketing and increasing the number of RDOs, etc.

So we need to spend at least £50m a year on club rugby.
And even if all the clubs gave up their share to a new community rugby union - the capital could not generate that sort of money.


Sweeney Delenda Est
Back to Top
Big Eddie View Drop Down
World Cup Winner
World Cup Winner
Avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 5045
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Big Eddie Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 Jan 2024 at 11:33
Camquin,

Please see my replies to your points in red below

Kind Regards
Big Eddie


Originally posted by Camquin Camquin wrote:

The problem is that without the TV contract for internationals, there is no income.
IF you split the sport, the professional game will take all of that.
That fundamentally does not matter if the Community game gets its fair share of the assets they own - see below

And the game does need some administration.
Agreed but see below - People costs for the Community game could be managed at a fraction of the £8.8m reportedly spent on the Community game by the RFU in 2023 (as set out on page 34 of the 2023 RFU Annual report)

As do all the things that the RFU is not currently doing, like marketing and increasing the number of RDOs, etc. The RFU currently spends little on this so a new entity could easily surpass this and provide 100 RDOs - see below

So we need to spend at least £50m a year on club rugby.

No we don't see below

According to the RFU 2023 Accounts in 2023 the RFU spent £31.1m on Community Rugby (Compared to £68.3m on Professional Rugby)

The split of the Community Games' £31.1m was as follows:

£8.8m People costs
£9.7m Rugby Programme Investment
£3.2m Rugby World Cup 2025 Impact Projects
£1.2m Governance and Business Transformation Projects
£4.0m Insurance (estimated as figure not separately shown just the £0.6m increase)
£3.5m Constituent Bodies funding (estimated as figure not separately shown just the £0.4m increase)
£0.7m Depreciation (estimated as depreciation of 3 G pitches not separately shown)
£31.1m total

I am sure the Community game could save at least 50% of the above costs if not considerably more. 

So if base costs were say £15m per annum and we added 100 RDO's at a £50k per annum annual cost each total spend annual spend would be no more than £20m pa

If the £1billion from the dissolution of the RFU was distributed 50% to Community clubs £250k each (total £500m)  together with an annual £2.5K levy from the clubs this would provide £5m of the required £20m per annum

The balance of £500m could be invested at say a 5% annual yield to provide an income of £25m p.a. to run Community Rugby........

Community Rugby income p.a. £30m 
Community Rugby spend   p.a. £20m
Annual surplus                        £10m
Result!

And even if all the clubs gave up their share to a new community rugby union - the capital could not generate that sort of money.

It doesn't need to be £50m p.a. see above 



Edited by Big Eddie - 10 Jan 2024 at 11:35
''The future isn't what it used to be''
Back to Top
WEvans View Drop Down
World Cup Winner
World Cup Winner


Joined: 08 Dec 2016
Location: London
Status: Offline
Points: 1456
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote WEvans Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 Jan 2024 at 14:17
Originally posted by Berksrugby Berksrugby wrote:

Interesting and well thought out idea?! It is madness, pure and simple.

Have you taken leave of your senses rugbychris? Then again, who isn't partial to a free handout now and then.

LOL



Perhaps instead of criticising and insulting others you could offer your solution to the problem? 
Back to Top
Big Eddie View Drop Down
World Cup Winner
World Cup Winner
Avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 5045
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Big Eddie Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 Jan 2024 at 14:54
Berksrugby,

My answer to your derisory snort is in red below.

Originally posted by Berksrugby Berksrugby wrote:

Interesting and well thought out idea?! It is madness, pure and simple.

The economics and the rationale are well founded. It is not madness it is an Alexander the Great solution to the problem of the intractable and enduring Gordian Knot which has remained unsolved since Professionalism. The Professional Game and the Community Game are very different. Why shouldn't these two games be separated?

Have you taken leave of your senses rugbychris? Then again, who isn't partial to a free handout now and then.

There is no free hand out. The Community Clubs own 99.9% of the RFU and its assets.......at the moment such assets are diverted to pay....The 10 Premiership Clubs, CVC, King Billy and his courtiers with precious little going to the Community Game

LOL


Why is it madness? I can give you plenty of examples where large corporate entities have undertaken a transaction/demerger/Management buyout etc to resolve a fundamental shareholder issue.

This is one of these cases.

The Community Game gets very little from the RFU. The whole structure of the RFU is devoted to satisfying the needs of the Professional and the Elite Game and of course keeping King Billy and his acolytes in hugely well remunerated employment.

In any reasonable corporate entity there would be way more accountability and democracy.
The Rules of the RFU are shockingly undemocratic and enable an unelected Executive Management and board to act without oversight to the huge detriment of the Community Game.

Berksrugby, if you can show me how and where there is any effective oversight of King Billy and his courtiers I will be happy to engage with you on this point. However I do not believe you will be able to as I have read the Rules of the RFU and it is clear to me that the RFU Council has absolutely no teeth whatsoever!

King Billy can reign with impunity.......
''The future isn't what it used to be''
Back to Top
Big Eddie View Drop Down
World Cup Winner
World Cup Winner
Avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 5045
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Big Eddie Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 Jan 2024 at 16:50
In my view the Community Clubs in English Rugby are sleep walking to a disaster that will see  Private Equity (CVC) with the help of the Executive Management of the RFU (AKA as King Billy and his courtiers) controlling English rugby and all of the RFU's resources.

CVC did not get into Rugby to be a bit player, effective control is what they want and with King Billy at the helm of the RFU, and a supine RFU board and RFU Council, they will get what they want without even putting their hand in their pocket to buy out rights of the Community Clubs .

While CVC and King Billy plot their course the Community Clubs watch with disinterest.

The RFU with its undemocratic Rules and King Billy at the helm is almost the perfect vehicle to control. They can ignore the membership because they never find common cause and even if the Championship Clubs kick up a stink what can they actually do about it?


Edited by Big Eddie - 10 Jan 2024 at 16:57
''The future isn't what it used to be''
Back to Top
Berksrugby View Drop Down
First XV squad
First XV squad


Joined: 18 Apr 2023
Location: Not given
Status: Offline
Points: 43
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Berksrugby Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 Jan 2024 at 18:01
Big 'Red' Eddie,

In the interests of this thread not becoming your own personal monologue, rant, misplaced sales pitch, witch hunt or whatever else you care to call it, all devoid of rational discussion for the here and now, I have penned a response to your confused ramblings following what you deemed to be a 'derisory snort' from myself.

1) Toughen up. In the 50+ years I have been following rugby, I have come to expect and enjoy the company of those who can handle a difference of opinion without throwing their toys out the pram or crying into their pillow if someone disagrees with them. Leave the Snowflakes to follow other sports with different shaped balls.

2) When I see or hear someone (online or in the flesh) attempting to stir up an idea, ideology, revolution so far detached from reality and (in this case) what the ordinary player/fan enjoys and is content with on their Saturday afternoon, I have always stood up and challenged said propaganda. Who do you think you are talking on behalf of, aside from 6 or 7 semi pro Championship clubs?

3) Please stop referring to the Championship as 'Community rugby'. It is simply not the case. Whilst some of the clubs trying to keep their head afloat in the Championship may once have been true community clubs, those days are gone. Community rugby starts at National 1 and below, as evidenced by the tackle height law changes not affecting the top 2 tiers, which are exempt.
Any league that houses fully pro sides like ET, Donny etc, can't be considered to be playing Community rugby.

4) I have had sight of the '3 polls' you created in a thinly veiled attempt to service your own agenda as a supporter of a club set to miss out when Premiership 2 is borne and semi pro clubs are removed. Quite frankly, they make laughable reading. The number of responses (or distinct lack of) should be all the evidence that you need to finally realise that, not only are you fighting a losing battle, but in all truth, no battle at all. It is viewed as a non-issue by the considerable masses that play and support rugby in this country. Several posters have pointed this out to you in different ways, yet you don't seem to be getting the message. To paraphrase, I think it was Einstein that coined the phrase about madness being the preserve of those who do the same thing again and again, expecting a different result. You would do well to take heed of this.

5) I am not a numbers man, of that I freely admit. You can examine the RFU administrative documents all you like with your background in finances, and then highlight the fine grain detail that fits your agenda to try and justify your discontent and coup d'etat against the RFU; but when all is said and done, it won't make a blind bit of difference. In 6 -12 months time, tell me I'm wrong.

There is nothing more I can add, other than to wish you well, in the hope that you can move on from this slightly unhealthy preoccupation of fighting a battle that isn't there to be fought, and to be at peace with yourself.


Edited by Berksrugby - 10 Jan 2024 at 18:10
Back to Top
Berksrugby View Drop Down
First XV squad
First XV squad


Joined: 18 Apr 2023
Location: Not given
Status: Offline
Points: 43
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Berksrugby Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 Jan 2024 at 18:22
Originally posted by WEvans WEvans wrote:

Originally posted by Berksrugby Berksrugby wrote:

Interesting and well thought out idea?! It is madness, pure and simple.

Have you taken leave of your senses rugbychris? Then again, who isn't partial to a free handout now and then.

LOL



Perhaps instead of criticising and insulting others you could offer your solution to the problem? 

WEvans, 

Please refer to points 1), 2) and 4) in my longer post above for an answer to your question. 

No insult intended, but clearly there are some thin-skinned rugby folk out there on this forum.


Edited by Berksrugby - 10 Jan 2024 at 18:31
Back to Top
Big Eddie View Drop Down
World Cup Winner
World Cup Winner
Avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 5045
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Big Eddie Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 Jan 2024 at 18:57

Dear Berksrugby,

Thank you for the enhanced moniker, as a Liverpool supporter it works rather well and I appreciate your response. I have set out my responses in red under the points you have raised.

Originally posted by Berksrugby Berksrugby wrote:

Big 'Red' Eddie,

In the interests of this thread not becoming your own personal monologue, rant, misplaced sales pitch, witch hunt or whatever else you care to call it, all devoid of rational discussion for the here and now, I have penned a response to your confused ramblings following what you deemed to be a 'derisory snort' from myself.

I don't think my ramblings were confused . They are logical. For the past 35 years I have earned my living putting forward such radical propositions and executing on them.

1) Toughen up. In the 50+ years I have been following rugby, I have come to expect and enjoy the company of those who can handle a difference of opinion without throwing their toys out the pram or crying into their pillow if someone disagrees with them. Leave the Snowflakes to follow other sports with different shaped balls.

I am surprised that you were affronted by my description of your reply to WEvans post as a 'derisory snort'. I thought my description was apt. I am certainly not a Snowflake and I can certainly handle a difference of opinion.

2) When I see or hear someone (online or in the flesh) attempting to stir up an idea, ideology, revolution so far detached from reality and (in this case) what the ordinary player/fan enjoys and is content with on their Saturday afternoon, I have always stood up and challenged said propaganda. Who do you think you are talking on behalf of, aside from 6 or 7 semi pro Championship clubs?

I am certainly not talking on behalf of the Championship clubs or Caldy. Having followed Camquin's advice and having read and reviewed the Rules of the RFU I was aghast at the staggeringly  undemocratic nature of them. 

Whilst watching Caldy's 2nd xv match last Saturday a very respected former referee and rugby player questioned me as what was to be done about the RFU and its lack of democracy. 

I explained that there was little that could be done given the current Rules of the RFU. When I explained how the board of the RFU was elected by the board of the RFU and set its own pay and rations etc and had almost complete power with no effective oversight by the Council he was absolutely dumbfounded. "Eddie you have to draw this to everyone's attention in any way you can". I have obliged.

The RFU itself knows how 'wrong' the current rules are and in July 2023 indicated that it would undertake a review of the Rules. That it is going to take until late 2024 to do this is hugely unsettling, troubling and, given the inordinate length of time that is being proposed (nearly 18 months for something that should take a couple of months at most) raises suspicion that the RFU's Executive Management want to retain its omnipotence to effect a change that would in the normal; course of events would be challenged by the Membership.

3) Please stop referring to the Championship as 'Community rugby'. It is simply not the case. Whilst some of the clubs trying to keep their head afloat in the Championship may once have been true community clubs, those days are gone. Community rugby starts at National 1 and below, as evidenced by the tackle height law changes not affecting the top 2 tiers, which are exempt.
Any league that houses fully pro sides like ET, Donny etc, can't be considered to be playing Community rugby.

I agree with you, my view of Community Clubs are National 1 and below. It is the Community Clubs that will be most badly affected if the Executive Management of the RFU and their friends at CVC have their way

4) I have had sight of the '3 polls' you created in a thinly veiled attempt to service your own agenda as a supporter of a club set to miss out when Premiership 2 is borne and semi pro clubs are removed. Quite frankly, they make laughable reading. The number of responses (or distinct lack of) should be all the evidence that you need to finally realise that, not only are you fighting a losing battle, but in all truth, no battle at all. It is viewed as a non-issue by the considerable masses that play and support rugby in this country. Several posters have pointed this out to you in different ways, yet you don't seem to be getting the message. To paraphrase, I think it was Einstein that coined the phrase about madness being the preserve of those who do the same thing again and again, expecting a different result. You would do well to take heed of this.

You are absolutely right. Although those 3 polls all had a 95%+ disapproval rating for the RFU....the numbers are so low, because of the disinterest from the Community Game, as to be not likely to generate any serious interest from other media. Richard Lowther challenged me to come up with a cause the Community Clubs could understand and get behind. 

I did, and put forward a radical proposal that the Community Clubs could get behind. The de coupling of the Professional Game from the Community Game through the sale of the RFU to the highest bidder and the proportionate distribution of assets which would let the Community Game reset.

5) I am not a numbers man, of that I freely admit. You can examine the RFU administrative documents all you like with your background in finances, and then highlight the fine grain detail that fits your agenda to try and justify your discontent and coup d'etat against the RFU; but when all is said and done, it won't make a blind bit of difference. In 6 -12 months time, tell me I'm wrong.

It is not the fine grain detail that is the problem it is the lack of oversight, accountability and democracy and the concentration of all effective power within an un-elected board. Any corporate lawyer that read the Rules of the RFU would be frankly incredulous that they can exist in this day and age. It is scandalous

I have set out a logical financial plan based upon the RFU's own numbers and I have corroborated another very knowledgeable poster's (Camquin) detailed review of the Rules of the RFU and I have confirmed that the Rules of the RFU consolidate almost total power in the hands of an un-elected board.

A la Donald Trump you have chosen to ignore the detail and to deflect . 
 

There is nothing more I can add, other than to wish you well, in the hope that you can move on from this slightly unhealthy preoccupation of fighting a battle that isn't there to be fought, and to be at peace with yourself.

Berksrugby, I am highlighting issues I am very familiar with in a professional capacity. If everyone chooses to ignore my comments and completely disagree with me that is absolutely fine from my point of view. Having being asked the questions by others and encouraged to shed light on what I consider to be akin to a scandal I am perfectly at peace with myself. 



Edited by Big Eddie - 10 Jan 2024 at 19:02
''The future isn't what it used to be''
Back to Top
Greg View Drop Down
First XV regular
First XV regular


Joined: 30 Jan 2020
Location: Norfolk
Status: Offline
Points: 110
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Greg Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 Jan 2024 at 20:12
This is all getting rather 'unecessary'. Let's move on and all play nicely together.
That the game of Rugby Union in this country (and others, incidentally) is at a crossroads is not in any doubt. What is not clear to anybody (it would seem) is the best way forward.

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.04
Copyright ©2001-2021 Web Wiz Ltd.