World Rugby to trial red card replacements...

World Rugby is planning to run trials on red cards and examine tackle height in the elite game as part of moves to improve the sport's safety and appeal. It is also looking at ways to speed up the game as part of a new five-stage plan unveiled on Tuesday. The governing body says it is focused on "enhancing ball in flow, reducing stoppages and increasing welfare". World Rugby chairman Sir Bill Beaumont said the measures would "excite the next generation of fans and players". "Change is in rugby's DNA," he added. "That means being bold, embracing change by dialling up the entertainment value, making our stars more accessible and simplifying terminology and language used to explain rugby to those who are yet to fall in love with it."

First phase: Law Application Guidelines reinforcing existing law From 19 March, there will be an expectation of strict application of current law by referees globally via the following Law Application Guidelines, focusing on speeding up play: Law 15.17: Players will be expected to use the ball more quickly when the ball has been secured at a ruck/breakdown. Referees will be asked to call “use it” earlier, which will begin the five second count to play the ball away. Law 19.10: Hookers will be expected to maintain a full brake foot to aid scrum stability and safety during the engagement sequence. Any adjustment must maintain the act of the brake. Law 6.29: Strict reinforcement of the 2022 law trial relating to water carriers entering the field of play. Second phase: Law amendment recommendations for global adoption   A package of law amendments will be considered by the World Rugby Council at its 9 May meeting. Each is aimed at enhancing game continuity: Recommendation to make adjustments to Law 10 in relation to players being put onside when there are kicks in open play, as per the current Super Rugby Pacific trial which aims to reduce kick tennis. Removal of the scrum option from a free-kick at a scrum, reducing dead time. Outlawing the practice of the ‘croc roll’, reinforcing player welfare focus Third phase: Closed law trials Unions and competition owners will be encouraged to implement a package of closed law trials which can be adopted at domestic or cross-border level, aimed at enhancing game continuity: Expansion of the shot clock for scrum and lineouts and reduced kicking time. Ability to mark the ball inside the 22m line from a restart, promoting attacking options. The ball must be played after the maul has been stopped once, not twice. Protection of the nine at the base of the scrum, ruck and at the maul following successful trials in Major League Rugby in the USA and in elite and community competitions in New Zealand. Play on for lineout not straight if the throw in is uncontested. Fouth phase: Specialist working groups Specialist working groups will be established to further explore aspects identified by the Shape of the Game forum for further consideration. Recommendations will be made to Council.   On- and off-field sanctions: Comprehensive review of the sport’s disciplinary and sanctioning processes with the objective of streamlining, increasing simplicity, consistency and fan understanding. A key consideration will be the potential to combine stronger off-field sanctions for foul play with a global red card trial where a carded player is removed for the duration of the match but may be replaced by another player after 20 minutes. The final proposal will go to World Rugby’s Council in May. Tackle/Ruck/Breakdown: A major review of safety and spectacle issues as they relate to the breakdown, e.g. the impact of contesting the ball on the floor, jackal as opposed to an upright driving game. Television Match Official (TMO) protocol: Determine the optimal remit for the TMO protocol, while setting new minimum standards for technology providers. Replacements: Examine the latest research on the impact of fatigue and the number and timing of replacements in the elite game to determine options that might create more space on the field while improving injury rates. Fan experience: Build rugby’s attention share via a fan-focused view of how the game is marketed, a consistent approach to presentation of the sport across all media environments and a focus on the moments in the game that really engage fans. This will include a thorough review of the language and terminology that is used within the game. Tackle height: Consider the results of the community tackle height trials across 11 unions and consider appropriateness for elite rugby. Fifth phase: Examine impact of specific aspects of the game in new Rugby Labs New Rugby Labs, which enable World Rugby to test out new aspects of law in a controlled environment evaluated by data and player feedback, will be utilised to examine the impact of aspects of the game that either have an impact on speed or safety. These are likely to include the scrum engagement sequence and the tackle/ruck area. Next steps New Law Application Guidelines will come into effect from 19 March globally. The World Rugby Council will consider a package of Shape of the Game forum recommendations at its next meeting on 9 May. Some measures will take longer consideration and will be introduced in line with the defined moratorium windows for the men’s, women’s and sevens formats.

This is just to appease Australia.

Sorry what do you mean by this statement 

Those players in my opinion should remain from the field of play and not be replaced after 20 minutes 

The only reason this is being considered is because the people who have paid £250 for a ticket want to see a more competitive game of rugby. 

Personally, I don't think that either the World Cup final nor the Premiership final was 'ruined' by a red card, despite the losing side in each playing nearly an hour with 14 men.

RL has always been more popular in Australia so nothing new here.

And I bet RA wish they had the influence you think they do.

To issue a card, there has to be foul play.

Players at this level should know how to tackle.

What do we have to do to ingrain safety into coaching?

The tongue in cheek answer to your question is for coaches to train their players to run in straight lines and not to duck to make tacking them safer for all parties. Unfortunately (fortunately) that isn't going to happen and it is inevitable that in a dynamic fast moving game players will suffer head knocks no matter how much the tackler tries to avoid it. 

I'm quite sure all coaches coach with safety in mind so it seems to me the twenty-minute red card with the carded player not being allowed to return and being the subject of further disciplinary action is a sensible approach. To me the real problem with this new regulation is that serious and deliberate foul play would not be punished as before but to be honest how often do we see red cards for this nowadays?