IMPORTANT Remember to read the rules of the board and abide by them when posting. |
Appeal |
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Author | ||
Thunderpants
First XV regular Joined: 22 Aug 2021 Location: Chesham Status: Offline Points: 95 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 13 Nov 2021 at 22:44 |
|
Interested on your thoughts on this verdict -
|
||
It really was from the 22....
|
||
Robb
World Cup Winner Joined: 24 Jan 2017 Location: South East Status: Offline Points: 1572 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
It's tough but sadly, that's the way the rules are written and thus alas have to be enforced that way. I do feel for Tring but the problem they have is that by the letter of the law, they have no choice but to accept the penalty.
|
||
FHLH
World Cup Winner Cambridge Joined: 19 Apr 2009 Location: Cambridge Status: Offline Points: 5409 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
A fascinating insight into law vs natural justice.
No doubt that Tring acted sensibly and responsibly, but paid the price for that. Perhaps what they should have done was to suspend all matches for a period of weeks and seen what the RFU did then. High risk but morally right What would have been the penalty had there been an outbreak following the Match? "Hand, foot, and mouth disease is contagious People with hand, foot, and mouth disease are usually most contagious during the first week that they are sick. People can sometimes spread the virus to others for days or weeks after symptoms go away or if they have no symptoms at all." |
||
"My father told me big men fall just as quick as little ones, if you put a sword through their hearts."
|
||
BruceElliott
World Cup Winner Joined: 05 Oct 2017 Location: Tunbridge Wells Status: Offline Points: 315 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Tring were in a no-win situation.
tl;dr - Do the right thing, get punished. 12 - "...Tring RUFC acted responsibly in stopping the spread among their own players and preventing a spread to Dorking RFC players." 14 - "We should deal first with the suggestion that dismissing this appeal would lead to a situation where the health and safety of future players would be put at risk because clubs in the position of Tring RUFC might decide to field players even though they might be infected. Any such action would be contrary to the core values of the game, including the values of integrity and respect. In our judgement any Club which put any player at risk by fielding players who were known to be at real risk of passing on an infection to other players and teams would be very likely to face proceedings under the RFU Regulations and Rules (including Rule 5.12) for penalties far in excess of a 5-point deduction... the response by Tring RUFC to the outbreak of HFM was a proper and reasonable response to the situation." 16 - "In our judgment the League Secretary and the Disciplinary panel below were entitled to consider that the 5-point deduction was properly imposed on Tring RUFC. We consider that Mr Kaminski was right to submit that even if a club acts reasonably and properly (as Tring RUFC did), that does not mean that they have a justifiable reason under Regulation 13.6.11(b) for not fulfilling the fixture." The decision is made and nothing anyone says here will make any difference, but as we're here... I'm not a Dorking or Tring supporter. I understand the frustration from Dorking's perspective. Under the circumstances Tring did the right thing. I don't think there's any benefit to anyone in the points deduction. I really feel for Tring. |
||
SurreyRugby
British and Irish Lion Joined: 27 Oct 2018 Location: - Status: Offline Points: 154 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Hi. It is unfortunate for Tring. It is noted that Tring played a 3rd team on the Friday evening plus a full programme of junior games on the Sunday. If this disease was so infectious, why did these games take place? I'm a bit confused by Trings abitary actions.
|
||
Raider999
World Cup Winner Joined: 18 Jan 2013 Location: Crawley Status: Offline Points: 4478 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Presumably because the outbreak was confined to the first team squad who probably train at different times or separately from the rest of the club. It is also possible that any other club members who could have been affected through contact with the first team squad were withdrawn from junior fixtures? |
||
RAID ON
|
||
carlos fandango
World Cup Winner Joined: 14 Jun 2011 Location: Hertford Status: Offline Points: 891 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Far from being a Tring supporter but I do have sympathy for them.
This does show the difference between justice and law which is often confused. When I read the judgement, it did strike me that it was very confused but that the panel had decided to punish Tring come what may. Then again, I'm no lawyer.
Edited by carlos fandango - 14 Nov 2021 at 11:25 |
||
MikeGC
World Cup Winner Joined: 04 Oct 2014 Location: Burnage Status: Offline Points: 474 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Am I being naive ?
Every sympathy for both Clubs but… Surely, 2nd XV players step into the 1st XV, 3rd XV players step into the 2nd XV, etc. until the lowest senior team at the club postpones their fixture. Three 1st XV players unavailable Three 2nd XV players step up into the 1st XV Three 3rd XV players step into the 2nd XV Happened at my club a few weeks ago. Each team got a thorough spanking but we fulfilled our commitments. Edited by MikeGC - 15 Nov 2021 at 16:03 |
||
Shamrose
World Cup Winner Joined: 03 Sep 2010 Location: Surrey Status: Offline Points: 919 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
That is what it comes down to
|
||
SurreyRugby
British and Irish Lion Joined: 27 Oct 2018 Location: - Status: Offline Points: 154 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Perfect. That is what I was trying to say
|
||
carlos fandango
World Cup Winner Joined: 14 Jun 2011 Location: Hertford Status: Offline Points: 891 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Don't disagree with that sentiment, but can a club say that the disparity between 3rd and 1st XV is so great that there is a question of player safety there too?
PS: My assumption is that 2nd team trains with first so are potentially infectious too. Edited by carlos fandango - 14 Nov 2021 at 14:28 |
||
Count Ford
World Cup Winner Joined: 20 May 2017 Location: WA4 Status: Offline Points: 412 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Can anyone confirm if any clubs have had to postpone matches due to Covid and if they have been deducted 5 points? If not it seems a hugely unfair and arbitrary decision against Tring.
|
||
dave2dave
First XV regular Joined: 26 Mar 2018 Location: Witzend Status: Offline Points: 83 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
edited 100 times sometimes best to say nothing. |
||
Thatbloke
World Cup Winner Joined: 02 Sep 2017 Location: Newport Status: Offline Points: 1760 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Plenty postponed due to Covid at all levels - no sanctions imposed
|
||
Count Ford
World Cup Winner Joined: 20 May 2017 Location: WA4 Status: Offline Points: 412 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Presumably there are specific coronavirus regulations then...but it seems unbelievably self important to have no points deduction for one contagious disease, but a points deduction for another. Surely a suspended sentence and the forfeit of the game, would have kept the message of the importance of fulfilling fixtures while not unduly punishing the club.
|
||
dropout22
World Cup Winner Joined: 03 Jul 2017 Location: UK Status: Offline Points: 524 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Surely at that level all players train together??
|
||
dropout22
World Cup Winner Joined: 03 Jul 2017 Location: UK Status: Offline Points: 524 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Looking at Dorking's form anyways, Tring would've at best come away with a LBP - if lucky.
|
||
Thunderpants
First XV regular Joined: 22 Aug 2021 Location: Chesham Status: Offline Points: 95 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
SurreyRugby Hi. It is unfortunate for Tring. It is noted that Tring played a 3rd team on the Friday evening plus a full programme of junior games on the Sunday. If this disease was so infectious, why did these games take place? I'm a bit confused by Trings abitary actions. Edited by Thunderpants - 14 Nov 2021 at 19:23 |
||
It really was from the 22....
|
||
Thunderpants
First XV regular Joined: 22 Aug 2021 Location: Chesham Status: Offline Points: 95 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
[QUOTE=MikeGC]Am I being naive ?
Every sympathy for both Clubs but… Surely, 2nd XV players step into the 1st XV, 3rd XV players step into the 2nd XV, etc. until the lowest senior team at the club postpones their fixture. Not naive at all Mike,your description of 'how it works' is spot on. Tring 2nds and 1's train as one squad , the 3's separately. And with all respect to them, very few would be able to step up to the 2's ,let alone the 1's. |
||
It really was from the 22....
|
||
SurreyRugby
British and Irish Lion Joined: 27 Oct 2018 Location: - Status: Offline Points: 154 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Hi Thunderpants. You probably know more about how Tring are structured.
I don't know any club at this level with different training for the seniors. Do they also use seperate changing rooms and bar areas too? If this disease is so contagious then the whole tring clubhouse would have to be closed too. |
||
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |