IMPORTANT Remember to read the rules of the board and abide by them when posting. |
Old games on Youtube |
Post Reply |
Author | |||
Richard Lowther
Coaching staff Moderator Joined: 19 May 2007 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 6605 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 21 Apr 2020 at 20:02 |
||
I've been watching a fair few old games on Youtube during lock down and it may be through the lenses of rose tinted glasses but the game seemed more open, more enterprising and faster.
The forwards were up quickly for scrums, resets conspicuous by their absence. The ball came out - possibly at the back of either side regardless of who put in and the scrum halves could actually do dive passes and the backs could pass along a line and not have to bother about this taking it back into a melee of forwards. The forwards rucked out quick ball and hardly seemed to run into their opposite numbers deliberately. You could acuse the game of being more scraggy, more off the cuff and referees trying to let the game run and offences were probably missed but did it matter?
|
|||
Mark W-J
Coaching staff Joined: 22 May 2007 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 3680 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
What era are you looking at, Richard? I watched a programme about the opening of the clubhouse at ODP in 1969, and the footage showed 30 bodies doing God-knows-what - it really looked like nobody had a defined role, regardless of the number on their back.
But the 2005 Grand Slam game was shown on BBC Wales a couple of weeks ago, and it was interesting to see that the scrums were set within seconds of being awarded (OK, a fair few went down, but even allowing for the reset they were over quicker than we see today) and the referee (Chris White) allowed barely a second for the tackled payer to release the ball before penalising him. No jackalling - defending teams simply weren't allowed to put their hands on the ball - and the speed of ball from the rucks was incredible. Oh, and no tattoos....
|
|||
JonDee
World Cup Winner Joined: 25 May 2007 Location: Nottingam Status: Offline Points: 1395 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Agreed although I think part of the reason is they did not have the dreaded TV multiple replay which is the only reason we have TMO. Which is good in some ways re foul play but does take away from a lot of the excitement
|
|||
corporalcarrot
World Cup Winner Joined: 22 Sep 2013 Location: St Brelade Status: Offline Points: 4724 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Let all your memories be good ones when it never rained, the sun shone, wingers scored more tries than hookers & high & late tackles happened all the time and didn't lead to tmo inquests. Beer came in jugs and was consumed in the changing rooms & bottles of LBV port was always passed around the bar. We sang club songs after games!
|
|||
Dont kick it. Pick it up and GO FORWARD.
|
|||
Ex Coach
First XV regular Joined: 15 Apr 2012 Location: Leicester Status: Offline Points: 129 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Let's be honest everyone knows that the game was better when they played
|
|||
Colin
|
|||
Novocastrian
First XV squad Joined: 19 May 2015 Location: Newcastle Status: Offline Points: 38 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Yes the game was ‘scraggy’ but let’s remember they were amateur players. The weight and build of backs was totally different to today, a hell of a lot more space in open play. And they actually tried to move the ball AWAY from the big boys (funny that).
I’ve got to say I do agree with Richard and I really enjoy watching games from the 80s and 90s - more line breaks, more flair, plenty more knock ons and mistakes but it adds to the spectacle. I have to be honest, it’s no wonder non rugby fans find rugby boring these days. It’s stop start, and it’s effectively a battle of attrition. Add into the fact there’s 8 subs now, you just replace a tired gym monkey for a gym monkey who’s fresh and the battle starts all over again. I honestly think I get more enjoyment out of watching a good L4, L5 or L6 game then I do when I go and watch Newcastle Falcons or even England at Twickenham. Whilst I’m on the point about Twickenham - the place is soulless full of people there to update their Instagram account and don’t care about the ruby whatsoever. Wow that was a bit of rant!
|
|||
Pappashanga
World Cup Winner Joined: 23 Sep 2014 Location: Surrey Status: Offline Points: 2167 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
The scrum penalty plus rolling maul rewards teams with poor backs. Mind you, so did the constant kicks to touch from anywhere before the rules changed whenever it was, decades ago. The most exciting rugby I watched was the University of Cape Town in the mid to late sixties when HO de Villiers was full back. He used to run through the opposition with ease. It is difficult to judge the standard,as you would get quite ordinary players mixing with internationals in a competition called the Grand Challenge. Next step was provincial rugby, then Test.
|
|||
pappashanga
|
|||
Richard Lowther
Coaching staff Moderator Joined: 19 May 2007 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 6605 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Nothings changed at ODP then Mark! Mainly the 70s and 80s, Five Nations matches plus the odd Lions highlights.
|
|||
Richard Lowther
Coaching staff Moderator Joined: 19 May 2007 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 6605 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I am trying to pin down when the game became more stop start. It's easy to say when the game went open, but when exactly?
Did the legalisation of lifting in the line outs in 1999 suddenly make the line out slow down or did that come later? Are the multiple changes to the scrum laws the cause of the current scrum farce or the symptom?
|
|||
Raider999
World Cup Winner Joined: 18 Jan 2013 Location: Crawley Status: Offline Points: 4478 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Not sure lifting slows a line-out down, but what it does do is put players in dangerous positions by being 5-6 feet off the ground - certainly one rule I would change Scrums have slowed down considerably since referees were charged with the ridiculous countdown - again change it A reduction in the number of subs would mean players would have to lose weight to be able to last 80 minutes - being able to change over half the side is ridiculous - change to 3 front row and 2 others. |
|||
RAID ON
|
|||
Richard Lowther
Coaching staff Moderator Joined: 19 May 2007 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 6605 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
From the clips I have been watching, the ball went into touch, the forwards got there - as fast as they could and the hooker threw in.
No waiting for calls, no props turning their backs, then going back the same way, no player changing position in the lineouts, no delaying to get to the line for either a breather or tactical. Line outs were aesthetically ugly but they got the job done - returned the ball into play quickly, with a fair chance that the other side could win it. Do we need to anything more fanciful to get that job done? Sometimes were can't see the trees because of the Forest. |
|||
JonDee
World Cup Winner Joined: 25 May 2007 Location: Nottingam Status: Offline Points: 1395 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
The scrum laws have definitely slowed the game down but when you look at the size of the front 5 these days you can understand why they are needed in some form. You could not have the scrum crashing together and often going down as it used to or you would have serious injuries at virtually every game |
|||
Richard Lowther
Coaching staff Moderator Joined: 19 May 2007 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 6605 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
It's a separate debate around the safety of the scrum. One question to be asked is it a lack of technique that makes the scrum dangerous rather than weight and size? Proportionally I would argue that scrums have always had weight behind them, it's just now heavier, but is that on its own a reason for the issues we have with scrum safety?
|
|||
clieves
World Cup Winner Joined: 09 Jan 2008 Status: Offline Points: 426 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I'm not sure front 5's are any bigger now than they were 30 years ago - fitter yes, bigger no Orrell front 5 - 30 years ago must of been at least 100 stone ! Fletcher, Hitchen, Southern, Kimmins, Cusani !
|
|||
Pappashanga
World Cup Winner Joined: 23 Sep 2014 Location: Surrey Status: Offline Points: 2167 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
The biggest change I have seen since the fifties and sixties is the greater involvement of forwards in the running game. When I was a prop or No 8 no back would pass to me. Now you see forwards all over the field. Before anyone makes uncomplimentary comments about mobility, I was a faster runner than some of the backs.
|
|||
pappashanga
|
|||
Member728
World Cup Winner Joined: 13 Aug 2009 Location: RAG Status: Offline Points: 2727 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Your backs must have been really rubbish but that is South Africa
|
|||
Dobber
British and Irish Lion Joined: 03 Nov 2009 Status: Offline Points: 217 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
The look on the face of my lad the first time he saw a throw-in at the lineout from the 70's was a picture.. lobbed in one handed overhand in the general direction of an unorganised bundle of players who all just jumped a few inches, if they left the ground at all, left his gob completely smacked...
Rewatching internationals, the Haka has improved a lot, but I think that it's well past it's sell-by day and could do with being ditched. There are different tv channels available if you want to watch a dance-off. As for the modern game, some bits you can watch on fast forward and all you'll see is a flat defensive moving up, then back, then up, then back, then up, then.... you get the picture... some elements of the game need a rethink to keep it exciting for the paying punters... YouTube channel is taking a real hit though. The amount of stuff on there is incredible.... I'm about halfway through.....
Edited by Dobber - 22 Apr 2020 at 20:21 |
|||
Pappashanga
World Cup Winner Joined: 23 Sep 2014 Location: Surrey Status: Offline Points: 2167 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
That lineout description is still valid in many cases.
|
|||
pappashanga
|
|||
Blutarsky
World Cup Winner Joined: 17 Aug 2010 Location: / Status: Offline Points: 990 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
No it doesn't - it rewards teams with good forwards. There's no correlation between scrum penalties and 'poor' backs. Sorry to be curt, but this whole thread is nostalgic nonsense. I've watched games from the 70s and 80s and find them virtually unwatchable. There is no structure, no strategy, just 30 blokes chasing a ball and making umpteen mistakes. Games from that era remind me of what I see when I watch junior or mini teams playing. You can't fight progress.
|
|||
Richard Lowther
Coaching staff Moderator Joined: 19 May 2007 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 6605 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
But I counter by saying now we have too much structure and over played strategy created in a coaching environment that is not adapted to the playing conditions of the day. We have more reset scrums than ever through either mistakes or deliberate gamesmanship. What I'm looking for is a balance between "nostalgic nonsense" and today's "twenty three gym monkeys". Is it co-incidental that most changes made only affects the forwards. I'll repeat again, we've lost the point of why we have line outs and scrums. We've over engineered them to be the be all and end all for sixteen players on the pitch and forget that another fourteen players also exist. Edited by Richard Lowther - 24 Apr 2020 at 23:00 |
|||
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |