IMPORTANT Remember to read the rules of the board and abide by them when posting. |
League Structure 24/25?? |
Post Reply | Page 123> |
Author | |
WILD BOAR
First XV squad Joined: 06 Feb 2023 Location: GLOUCESTER Status: Offline Points: 51 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 12 Oct 2023 at 09:56 |
How about; 1. Premiership (10 teams), Premiership 2 (12 teams), National One N & S (14 teams each) 2. Premiership (10 teams), Premiership 2 (12 teams), Championship (14 teams), National One N & S (14 teams each) Any thoughts??
Edited by WILD BOAR - 12 Oct 2023 at 10:03 |
|
tigerburnie
World Cup Winner Joined: 10 Jun 2012 Location: Scotland Status: Offline Points: 3806 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I'm not sure 2 would work, Nat 1 now is pretty much semi pro, don't think there's enough sides across the Nat 2 leagues who could step up financially. Sadly it's not just about the rugby it's affording the travel now the RFU have abandoned the grass roots of rugby.
|
|
Camquin
World Cup Winner Joined: 01 Jun 2007 Location: Cambridge Status: Offline Points: 11453 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Isn't 2 essentially what we had before the reorganisation, albeit with some names changed and a few teams short. The phrase deckchairs and Titanic comes to mind. I think the changes that need to be made are more fundamental.
Edited by Camquin - 12 Oct 2023 at 11:05 |
|
Sweeney Delenda Est
|
|
WILD BOAR
First XV squad Joined: 06 Feb 2023 Location: GLOUCESTER Status: Offline Points: 51 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Tend to agree that 2 is not the way to go.
Option 1 would be easier to implement and would get rid of the 3 tier mess below. |
|
Camquin
World Cup Winner Joined: 01 Jun 2007 Location: Cambridge Status: Offline Points: 11453 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Is having three teams more of a mess than having two? I know the team that s level transferred to SW, or possibly SE, comes from further North, but overall surely travel per club has gone down. Anyway, the main travel problem was not at level 4 and 5, it was at levels 7 & 8.
|
|
Sweeney Delenda Est
|
|
WILD BOAR
First XV squad Joined: 06 Feb 2023 Location: GLOUCESTER Status: Offline Points: 51 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Under Nat 1 (N&S), you can then revert back to 4 tiers ( N,S,M & LSE) at Level 4.
Then 8 tiers, thus reducing travelling even further down the levels.
|
|
Rabbie Burns
World Cup Winner Joined: 18 Jul 2007 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 3352 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
There is no need to change level 3 it’s levels 1 & 2 where the problem lies but level 2 issues are not all of their own making the RFU has been compliant in a lot of the issues around structure. I wouldn’t be surprised to see further problems at the top end as the reliance on funding grows. Nat 1 is a great league with lots of good teams to split it would seriously deplete the competition more so in the north as depending on where you split there are currently 9 southern teams and 5 north so to get the the minimum teams required of 14 you would be pulling up so many teams and some of the gulfs would be huge. IMO Nat 2 needs to return to 2 divisions with 3 up and down. I also fail to see how you can raise money you require to run your club in a 10 team league
|
|
So many Christians not enough Lions
|
|
Camquin
World Cup Winner Joined: 01 Jun 2007 Location: Cambridge Status: Offline Points: 11453 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
But that was the structure that everyone was complaining about for
the last 12 years and two review cycles. Especially the Lancastrian clubs, who hated having to
travel to Cumbria. That was why things got changed. Now, I do not believe the change improved things, in fact it made them worse, especially when you add in the cups. But, I do not see how you fix things by simply going back to something you know does not work. |
|
Sweeney Delenda Est
|
|
Kentish Man
British and Irish Lion Joined: 29 Aug 2018 Location: Kent Status: Offline Points: 156 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Hi I believe option 1 was want the collective National clubs agreed certainly regarding N1 N/S
|
|
tigerburnie
World Cup Winner Joined: 10 Jun 2012 Location: Scotland Status: Offline Points: 3806 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
The only problem is going on previous move arounds, those in the RFU offices cannot read a map.
|
|
Camquin
World Cup Winner Joined: 01 Jun 2007 Location: Cambridge Status: Offline Points: 11453 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I think it was in the cup draw they managed to transpose the East and West labels, which got a lot of people confused - though I think the actual division of clubs was fairly reasonable.
|
|
Sweeney Delenda Est
|
|
BFG1
World Cup Winner Joined: 20 Jul 2007 Status: Offline Points: 313 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Believe option 3 is one wanted by RFU
10 prem 10 prem 2 12 Nat 1 N/S and called championship N/S NvS winner up into Prem 2 12 Nat 2 E/W/N Don't like this option but clubs will have no say, sorry i mean they'll get all clubs opinions and RFU/Prem will just go with what's best for them!
|
|
Rabbie Burns
World Cup Winner Joined: 18 Jul 2007 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 3352 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
11 home games does not generate enough income to run a club, 14 was the minimum that works depending on which division
|
|
So many Christians not enough Lions
|
|
Richard Lowther
Coaching staff Moderator Joined: 19 May 2007 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 6605 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Whatever the league format it does not solve any of the major issues affecting the game. It won't solve the financial disparity between the Premiership Clubs and everyone else, it won't resolve clubs still spending more than they earn, it won't create a pathway for players because the Academy structure isn't part of any reviews, it won't solve the declining media coverage, it won't solve the lack of a sponsor and lack of TV coverage.
Someone used the apt phrase of rearranging the chairs on the titanic. Radical reform is needed not just adding and subtracting clubs and renaming the leagues every few years. Madness is doing the same thing time after time and expecting a different result.
|
|
Raider999
World Cup Winner Joined: 18 Jan 2013 Location: Crawley Status: Offline Points: 4483 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Might suit the top 2 levels, but 11 home games for non-professional rugby doesn't give clubs much chance of survival. Sounds like change for changes sake that might see a large umber of clubs go to the wall over the next few years. This could be the end of Rugby Union as we know it. |
|
RAID ON
|
|
Halliford
World Cup Winner Joined: 17 Feb 2010 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 4245 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
National League Clubs have already told the RFU that they must have 13 home League matches each season to be sustainable. That could be done through 11 League matches and 2 play-off matches.
|
|
Kimbo
World Cup Winner Joined: 31 May 2007 Location: 'incleh Status: Offline Points: 6435 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
If you make the playoffs... (Unless of course all clubs are involved in promotion and relegation playoffs, which would be extremely contrived).
|
|
Our Club |
|
Robb
World Cup Winner Joined: 24 Jan 2017 Location: South East Status: Offline Points: 1587 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Don't do that would be my advice for the National League Clubs. They tried something similar last year with the pizza cups in lower leagues but the problem was some clubs only got 1 match back from the 2 they lost and many pulled out because they didn't fancy travelling which loses revenue for the clubs. They should insist on a 14 team league to continue.
|
|
kempstonblue
World Cup Winner Joined: 20 Jun 2020 Location: Kempston Status: Offline Points: 527 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I still await the confirmation that three of Prem2 franchises are
Wuss, Wasps and Irish. Then being franchises what the remaining seven clubs will need to enter the fray. I hate to say this, but for x years it will have to be a closed shop. Who is going to waste…whoops invest in a pro team next season, and watch the club get relegated to National 1, and reading comments a non professional league? |
|
The older I get, the more the RFU leave me confused.
|
|
Paul10
World Cup Winner Joined: 24 Mar 2023 Location: Milton Keynes Status: Offline Points: 757 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Have to agree with KempstonB. It might not feel right but a closed shop is the logical way to go.
|
|
Post Reply | Page 123> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |