IMPORTANT Remember to read the rules of the board and abide by them when posting. |
Purpose of the Premiership |
Post Reply | Page <12345> |
Author | |||
WEvans
World Cup Winner Joined: 08 Dec 2016 Location: London Status: Offline Points: 1378 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
So the RFU Executive is being hampered by an RFU council which no longer represents the rugby we know? Well it's all the RFU and it still sounds like the RFU isn't fit for purpose to me.
|
|||
WEvans
World Cup Winner Joined: 08 Dec 2016 Location: London Status: Offline Points: 1378 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
That was rather my point about all Premiership clubs being heavily in debt. I take tigerburnie's point about shareholders and no apparent wealthy benefactors but someone somewhere is keeping them afloat and I think to call it "paying their own way" is a little generous.
|
|||
tigerburnie
World Cup Winner Joined: 10 Jun 2012 Location: Scotland Status: Offline Points: 3646 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Tigers bought the adjacent land that was Granby Halls and have had a hotel built on the ground, it is being run for them by a specialist company called Bespoke, that will be helping pull in some income. The off-field investments are not finished as a new stand is to be built in the future which will include a multi storey car park, further increasing revenue to help the club sustain itself. I am not certain, but I am told the reason for the profit short fall prior to covid is because of the re-investment in these projects.
|
|||
Camquin
World Cup Winner Joined: 01 Jun 2007 Location: Cambridge Status: Offline Points: 11156 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
But of the £20m turnover, £5m comes From TV and Gallagher, another £2m from the RFU and £3m from sponsorship that relies on being on TV. |
|||
Sweeney Delenda Est
|
|||
tigerburnie
World Cup Winner Joined: 10 Jun 2012 Location: Scotland Status: Offline Points: 3646 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
and? The tv companies want to sell the product and are prepared to pay for it, do you expect the clubs to give the money away? Companies who sponsor want their product to be seen, on the terraces is fine, but on the tv it is seen by more people and is easy to see the advantage of going with a successful product. Premiership rugby is watched all around the rugby world, just like the other top leagues. The PRL is not making good decisions just now, now I agree changes need to be made, good governance and a league open to promotion and relegation, proper competition.
|
|||
Richard Lowther
Coaching staff Moderator Joined: 19 May 2007 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 6528 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I think the point that Camquin is trying to make is that the income of Premiership clubs is fragile and reliant on a combination of commercial revenue and money from owners and that if one part goes it leaves a club vulnerable. None are really living within their means.
|
|||
tigerburnie
World Cup Winner Joined: 10 Jun 2012 Location: Scotland Status: Offline Points: 3646 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
For some clubs yes that is true, what I don't like is that some try to make the case that all are in a bad way, rugby is a minority sport, gates lower than footballs 1st division for some, that does not mean that the game isn't worth having. Soccer as a pro sport has been round a long time and they still get it wrong, see Derby County recently, vultures will always look for easy pickings, the RFU and PRL just need to up there game and come into the 21st century.
|
|||
Richard Lowther
Coaching staff Moderator Joined: 19 May 2007 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 6528 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
But the evidence is that all Premiership clubs are in a bad way. One season of turning a profit does not extinguish all the previous seasons of debt. |
|||
Raider999
World Cup Winner Joined: 18 Jan 2013 Location: Crawley Status: Offline Points: 4434 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Whilst I agree with you in regard of the need for promotion/relegation, I would point out that probably the most successful league in the world (the NFL) plays I front of large packed stadiums week in week out and attracts a shed load of money from TV channels for coverage. That said I wouldn't want a closed shop such as the NFL has |
|||
RAID ON
|
|||
Camquin
World Cup Winner Joined: 01 Jun 2007 Location: Cambridge Status: Offline Points: 11156 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
||
The other point is the Premiership is not self=-sufficient, in that it takes players, and officials - from the other 5000 clubs. Especially Leicester - who were always something of a Leicestershire select XV. So, it is in its best interest to ensure those clubs are thriving and attracting more mini and juniors to turn up and take up rugby. At the moment they are not standing on their own two feet, they are reliant on the RFU for 10% of their income, and actually more as the RFU do not charge for the team of four. Outside the Premiership, the clubs that thrive are the ones where the 1st XV generates income for the club - from sponsorship, gate etc, and therefore the club can invest and grow. The clubs that fail are ones where the 1st XV sucks the money from the club, they might blaze for a little while using money from a sugar daddy, but they crash leaving a husk. And that applies to the sport in general. To thrive, the Premiership should be bringing money into the game, not sucking money out of it.
|
|||
Sweeney Delenda Est
|
|||
Richard Lowther
Coaching staff Moderator Joined: 19 May 2007 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 6528 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
||
But the entire structure and history of NFL (and other Professional American sports) is different. If you want to make comparisons it would be to compare NFL to the Football's Premier League, the latter also plays in front of packed stadiums and attracts a shed load of money from TV channels for coverage. The difference is it does that whilst maintaining relegation and promotion without blocking criteria. The other thing to mention about NFL is the 'socialistic' approach of the player draft - allowing the weakest team to have first choice of the best young talent to try and ensure a competitive league each season, whereas Premier League and Premiership go in the opposite direction and the richest clubs try to outspend their rivals to success.
|
|||
Rabbie Burns
World Cup Winner Joined: 18 Jul 2007 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 3322 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
The CEO (?) or a senior person from Leeds united was on radio 5 yesterday speaking about this and he felt that the NFL set up would never be mirrored anywhere else as it has been in place since the outset and couldn’t be replicated in another sport without rebuilding the whole structure
|
|||
So many Christians not enough Lions
|
|||
Big Eddie
World Cup Winner Joined: 19 Jun 2007 Status: Offline Points: 5029 |
Post Options
Thanks(2)
|
||
Says absolutely everything....@hitnailonhead
|
|||
''The future isn't what it used to be''
|
|||
Richard Lowther
Coaching staff Moderator Joined: 19 May 2007 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 6528 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
The irony is that you could replicate part of the NFL season format and by doing so have a more structured season which culminates in a grand final event which could drive audiences/television viewership/commercial income upwards. Simply you have the three European Leagues - Premiership, Top 14 and URC playing as 'Conferences' with a format that sees first a National Winner, then culminates in an European Champion. Relegation would still happen in the Premiership and Top 14 but at an earlier point in the season. Mirror the scheduling with the Championship fixtures and it would allow the newly promoted club an earlier opportunity to sign players than at present. |
|||
WEvans
World Cup Winner Joined: 08 Dec 2016 Location: London Status: Offline Points: 1378 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
All very commendable but I still don't believe Tigers are "paying their own way". I concede though that unlike many others they may do so in the future.
|
|||
FHLH
World Cup Winner Cambridge Joined: 19 Apr 2009 Location: Cambridge Status: Offline Points: 5264 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
The capital investment in the Granby land and hotel building would not be represented as a profit & loss cost but as an asset on the balance sheet. I suspect it may also be held in a separate company. Notwithstanding that, hats off to Leicester for being proactive in addressing their parlous state.
|
|||
"My father told me big men fall just as quick as little ones, if you put a sword through their hearts."
|
|||
Steve@Mose
World Cup Winner Joined: 01 Jun 2007 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 2761 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Slightly off topic but it seemed like it should be in this thread:
|
|||
Camquin
World Cup Winner Joined: 01 Jun 2007 Location: Cambridge Status: Offline Points: 11156 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
||
<fx: Brian Moore>
They pay academy players, what sort of message does that send. they should be playing for the love of the game. After all they are not good enough to play in the premiership.
</fx> Seriously, there is no more money, if anythin, clubs are alreafy spending more than they can afford. So if you want more equitable pay, the marqeee players will have to take a pay cut. Those marquee players raise the average (mean) wage ito about £100k, though the median is much lower.Giving a false perception. If you make level three and below amateur, then you cannot have paid academy players playong. So the Premiership would need to have more academy matches, costing more money, which can only come out of the current wage pool. |
|||
Sweeney Delenda Est
|
|||
tigerburnie
World Cup Winner Joined: 10 Jun 2012 Location: Scotland Status: Offline Points: 3646 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Marquee players have dropped to one per squad, I understand why they introduced it at the time to put bums on seats having a "world star" in the squad, but somehow that has sort of faded, there are many "stars" that are home grown these days, an example is the number of Tigers academy players currently in the club first team squad and the England squads too. What Moore says about academy players not good enough for the first team shows just how dumb he is, plenty of under 21 players played for England, Johhny Wilkinson probably the most famous, his comments epitomise the outdated dinosaur attitude of those jealous old men who didn't get paid when they played, some seem to inhabit the RFU.
|
|||
Camquin
World Cup Winner Joined: 01 Jun 2007 Location: Cambridge Status: Offline Points: 11156 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
To be fair Brian said National One players shoulsnot be paid as they are not good enough for the Premiership. I was twisting his words..
|
|||
Sweeney Delenda Est
|
|||
Post Reply | Page <12345> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |