National League Rugby Discussion Forum Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > League Rugby - www.leaguerugby.co.uk > Clubhouse chat
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Purpose of the Premiership
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

IMPORTANT Remember to read the rules of the board and abide by them when posting.

Purpose of the Premiership

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345>
Author
Message
WEvans View Drop Down
World Cup Winner
World Cup Winner


Joined: 08 Dec 2016
Location: London
Status: Offline
Points: 1378
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote WEvans Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Oct 2022 at 11:10
Originally posted by Halliford Halliford wrote:

Should I be flattered by the references to me? It’s not that I ama friend of the RFU, it’s more that barbs are thrown their way on this Forum which should be thrown elsewhere.

The RFU made a mistake in 1997 by not embracing professionalism and they have paid for it ever since. Clubs took control of the players and individuals driven by motives other than rugby took over the Clubs, leading to PRL which is a morally bankrupt entity.

Some years ago, misguided people at the RFU committed long-term funding to PRL, failing to link it to RFU profits. In recent years with the Pandemic, etc. the RFU has been forced into a difficult corner. 

Yes, things could be done better, but my experience is that the Executive is doing its best, hampered by an RFU Council which no longer represents the rugby we know. National League Rugby has 56 Clubs and 1 representative. Some CBs, such as Army Units, have fewer Clubs and more representatives. The Governance is outmoded but the belief and drive of the workers is still strong and supportive.

I don’t work for the RFU, I’m a Club Secretary who receives regular communications from them.

So the RFU Executive is being hampered by an RFU council which no longer represents the rugby we know? 

Well it's all the RFU and it still sounds like the RFU isn't fit for purpose to me.
Back to Top
WEvans View Drop Down
World Cup Winner
World Cup Winner


Joined: 08 Dec 2016
Location: London
Status: Offline
Points: 1378
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote WEvans Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Oct 2022 at 11:19
Originally posted by Camquin Camquin wrote:

Leicester made money in 2012. 2013 and 2014, but has lost money every year since.


That was rather my point about all Premiership clubs being heavily in debt. I take tigerburnie's point about shareholders and no apparent wealthy benefactors but someone somewhere is keeping them afloat and I think to call it "paying their own way" is a little generous.
Back to Top
tigerburnie View Drop Down
World Cup Winner
World Cup Winner


Joined: 10 Jun 2012
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 3646
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote tigerburnie Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Oct 2022 at 15:12
Originally posted by WEvans WEvans wrote:

Originally posted by Camquin Camquin wrote:

Leicester made money in 2012. 2013 and 2014, but has lost money every year since.


That was rather my point about all Premiership clubs being heavily in debt. I take tigerburnie's point about shareholders and no apparent wealthy benefactors but someone somewhere is keeping them afloat and I think to call it "paying their own way" is a little generous.
Tigers bought the adjacent land that was Granby Halls and have had a hotel built on the ground, it is being run for them by a specialist company called Bespoke, that will be helping pull in some income.
The off-field investments are not finished as a new stand is to be built in the future which will include a multi storey car park, further increasing revenue to help the club sustain itself. I am not certain, but I am told the reason for the profit short fall prior to covid is because of the re-investment in these projects.
Back to Top
Camquin View Drop Down
World Cup Winner
World Cup Winner
Avatar

Joined: 01 Jun 2007
Location: Cambridge
Status: Offline
Points: 11156
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Camquin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Oct 2022 at 16:16
But of the £20m turnover, £5m comes From TV and Gallagher, another £2m from the RFU and £3m from sponsorship that relies on being on TV.


Sweeney Delenda Est
Back to Top
tigerburnie View Drop Down
World Cup Winner
World Cup Winner


Joined: 10 Jun 2012
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 3646
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote tigerburnie Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Oct 2022 at 21:35
Originally posted by Camquin Camquin wrote:

But of the £20m turnover, £5m comes From TV and Gallagher, another £2m from the RFU and £3m from sponsorship that relies on being on TV.


and?
The tv companies want to sell the product and are prepared to pay for it, do you expect the clubs to give the money away? Companies who sponsor want their product to be seen, on the terraces is fine, but on the tv it is seen by more people and is easy to see the advantage of going with a successful product. Premiership rugby is watched all around the rugby world, just like the other top leagues.
The PRL is not making good decisions just now, now I agree changes need to be made, good governance and a league open to promotion and relegation, proper competition.
Back to Top
Richard Lowther View Drop Down
Coaching staff
Coaching staff
Avatar
Moderator

Joined: 19 May 2007
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 6528
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Richard Lowther Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Oct 2022 at 22:48
Originally posted by tigerburnie tigerburnie wrote:

Originally posted by Camquin Camquin wrote:

But of the £20m turnover, £5m comes From TV and Gallagher, another £2m from the RFU and £3m from sponsorship that relies on being on TV.


and?
The tv companies want to sell the product and are prepared to pay for it, do you expect the clubs to give the money away? Companies who sponsor want their product to be seen, on the terraces is fine, but on the tv it is seen by more people and is easy to see the advantage of going with a successful product. Premiership rugby is watched all around the rugby world, just like the other top leagues.
The PRL is not making good decisions just now, now I agree changes need to be made, good governance and a league open to promotion and relegation, proper competition.

I think the point that Camquin is trying to make is that the income of Premiership clubs is fragile and reliant on a combination of commercial revenue and money from owners and that if one part goes it leaves a club vulnerable. None are really living within their means. 
Moderator National League Rugby Message Boards



Remember Wakefield RFC
Back to Top
tigerburnie View Drop Down
World Cup Winner
World Cup Winner


Joined: 10 Jun 2012
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 3646
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote tigerburnie Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Oct 2022 at 11:06
Originally posted by Richard Lowther Richard Lowther wrote:

Originally posted by tigerburnie tigerburnie wrote:

Originally posted by Camquin Camquin wrote:

But of the £20m turnover, £5m comes From TV and Gallagher, another £2m from the RFU and £3m from sponsorship that relies on being on TV.


and?
The tv companies want to sell the product and are prepared to pay for it, do you expect the clubs to give the money away? Companies who sponsor want their product to be seen, on the terraces is fine, but on the tv it is seen by more people and is easy to see the advantage of going with a successful product. Premiership rugby is watched all around the rugby world, just like the other top leagues.
The PRL is not making good decisions just now, now I agree changes need to be made, good governance and a league open to promotion and relegation, proper competition.

I think the point that Camquin is trying to make is that the income of Premiership clubs is fragile and reliant on a combination of commercial revenue and money from owners and that if one part goes it leaves a club vulnerable. None are really living within their means. 
For some clubs yes that is true, what I don't like is that some try to make the case that all are in a bad way, rugby is a minority sport, gates lower than footballs 1st division for some, that does not mean that the game isn't worth having. Soccer as a pro sport has been round a long time and they still get it wrong, see Derby County recently, vultures will always look for easy pickings, the RFU and PRL just need to up there game and come into the 21st century.
Back to Top
Richard Lowther View Drop Down
Coaching staff
Coaching staff
Avatar
Moderator

Joined: 19 May 2007
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 6528
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Richard Lowther Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Oct 2022 at 13:10
Originally posted by tigerburnie tigerburnie wrote:

For some clubs yes that is true, what I don't like is that some try to make the case that all are in a bad way, rugby is a minority sport, gates lower than footballs 1st division for some, that does not mean that the game isn't worth having. Soccer as a pro sport has been round a long time and they still get it wrong, see Derby County recently, vultures will always look for easy pickings, the RFU and PRL just need to up there game and come into the 21st century.

But the evidence is that all Premiership clubs are in a bad way. 

One season of turning a profit does not extinguish all the previous seasons of debt.


Moderator National League Rugby Message Boards



Remember Wakefield RFC
Back to Top
Raider999 View Drop Down
World Cup Winner
World Cup Winner


Joined: 18 Jan 2013
Location: Crawley
Status: Offline
Points: 4434
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Raider999 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Oct 2022 at 13:28
Originally posted by tigerburnie tigerburnie wrote:

Originally posted by WEvans WEvans wrote:

Originally posted by Camquin Camquin wrote:

Leicester made money in 2012. 2013 and 2014, but has lost money every year since.



That was rather my point about all Premiership clubs being heavily in debt. I take tigerburnie's point about shareholders and no apparent wealthy benefactors but someone somewhere is keeping them afloat and I think to call it "paying their own way<span style="font-size: 9pt;">" is a little generous.</span>

Tigers bought the adjacent land that was Granby Halls and have had a hotel built on the ground, it is being run for them by a specialist company called Bespoke, that will be helping pull in some income.
The off-field investments are not finished as a new stand is to be built in the future which will include a multi storey car park, further increasing revenue to help the club sustain itself. I am not certain, but I am told the reason for the profit short fall prior to covid is because of the re-investment in these projects.


Whilst I agree with you in regard of the need for promotion/relegation, I would point out that probably the most successful league in the world (the NFL) plays I front of large packed stadiums week in week out and attracts a shed load of money from TV channels for coverage.

That said I wouldn't want a closed shop such as the NFL has
RAID ON
Back to Top
Camquin View Drop Down
World Cup Winner
World Cup Winner
Avatar

Joined: 01 Jun 2007
Location: Cambridge
Status: Offline
Points: 11156
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Camquin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Oct 2022 at 23:54
The other point is the Premiership is not self=-sufficient, in that it takes players, and officials - from the other 5000 clubs. Especially Leicester - who were always something of a Leicestershire select XV.

So, it is in its best interest to ensure those clubs are thriving and attracting more mini and juniors to turn up and take up rugby.

At the moment they are not standing on their own two feet, they are reliant on the RFU for 10% of their income, and actually more as the RFU do not charge for the team of four.

Outside the Premiership, the clubs that thrive are the ones where the 1st XV generates income for the club - from sponsorship, gate etc, and therefore the club can invest and grow. The clubs that fail are ones where the 1st XV sucks the money from the club, they might blaze for a little while using money from a sugar daddy, but they crash leaving a husk.

And that applies to the sport in general. To thrive, the Premiership should be bringing money into the game, not sucking money out of it.
Sweeney Delenda Est
Back to Top
Richard Lowther View Drop Down
Coaching staff
Coaching staff
Avatar
Moderator

Joined: 19 May 2007
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 6528
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Richard Lowther Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 Oct 2022 at 08:57
Originally posted by Raider999 Raider999 wrote:

 

Whilst I agree with you in regard of the need for promotion/relegation, I would point out that probably the most successful league in the world (the NFL) plays I front of large packed stadiums week in week out and attracts a shed load of money from TV channels for coverage.

That said I wouldn't want a closed shop such as the NFL has

But the entire structure and history of NFL (and other Professional American sports) is different.  
If you want to make comparisons it would be to compare NFL to the Football's Premier League, the latter also plays in front of packed stadiums and attracts a shed load of money from TV channels for coverage. The difference is it does that whilst maintaining relegation and promotion without blocking criteria. 

The other thing to mention about NFL is the 'socialistic' approach of the player draft - allowing the weakest team to have first choice of the best young talent to try and ensure a competitive league each season, whereas Premier League and Premiership go in the opposite direction and the richest clubs try to outspend their rivals to success. 
Moderator National League Rugby Message Boards



Remember Wakefield RFC
Back to Top
Rabbie Burns View Drop Down
World Cup Winner
World Cup Winner
Avatar

Joined: 18 Jul 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 3322
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Rabbie Burns Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 Oct 2022 at 09:12
The CEO (?) or a senior person from Leeds united was on radio 5 yesterday speaking about this and he felt that the NFL set up would never be mirrored anywhere else as it has been in place since the outset and couldn’t be replicated in another sport without rebuilding the whole structure 
So many Christians not enough Lions
Back to Top
Big Eddie View Drop Down
World Cup Winner
World Cup Winner
Avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 5029
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (2) Thanks(2)   Quote Big Eddie Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 Oct 2022 at 09:35
Originally posted by Camquin Camquin wrote:

 To thrive, the Premiership should be bringing money into the game, not sucking money out of it.

Says absolutely everything....@hitnailonhead
''The future isn't what it used to be''
Back to Top
Richard Lowther View Drop Down
Coaching staff
Coaching staff
Avatar
Moderator

Joined: 19 May 2007
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 6528
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Richard Lowther Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 Oct 2022 at 11:00
Originally posted by Rabbie Burns Rabbie Burns wrote:

The CEO (?) or a senior person from Leeds united was on radio 5 yesterday speaking about this and he felt that the NFL set up would never be mirrored anywhere else as it has been in place since the outset and couldn’t be replicated in another sport without rebuilding the whole structure 

The irony is that you could replicate part of the NFL season format and by doing so have a more structured season which culminates in a grand final event which could drive audiences/television viewership/commercial income upwards. 

Simply you have the three European Leagues - Premiership, Top 14 and URC playing as 'Conferences' with a format that sees first a National Winner, then culminates in an European Champion. 

Relegation would still happen in the Premiership and Top 14 but at an earlier point in the season. Mirror the scheduling with the Championship fixtures and it would allow the newly promoted club an earlier opportunity to sign players than at present. 
Moderator National League Rugby Message Boards



Remember Wakefield RFC
Back to Top
WEvans View Drop Down
World Cup Winner
World Cup Winner


Joined: 08 Dec 2016
Location: London
Status: Offline
Points: 1378
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote WEvans Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 Oct 2022 at 16:47
Originally posted by tigerburnie tigerburnie wrote:

Originally posted by WEvans WEvans wrote:

Originally posted by Camquin Camquin wrote:

Leicester made money in 2012. 2013 and 2014, but has lost money every year since.


That was rather my point about all Premiership clubs being heavily in debt. I take tigerburnie's point about shareholders and no apparent wealthy benefactors but someone somewhere is keeping them afloat and I think to call it "paying their own way" is a little generous.
Tigers bought the adjacent land that was Granby Halls and have had a hotel built on the ground, it is being run for them by a specialist company called Bespoke, that will be helping pull in some income.
The off-field investments are not finished as a new stand is to be built in the future which will include a multi storey car park, further increasing revenue to help the club sustain itself. I am not certain, but I am told the reason for the profit short fall prior to covid is because of the re-investment in these projects.

All very commendable but I still don't believe Tigers are "paying their own way".

I concede though that unlike many others they may do so in the future. 
Back to Top
FHLH View Drop Down
World Cup Winner
World Cup Winner
Avatar
Cambridge

Joined: 19 Apr 2009
Location: Cambridge
Status: Offline
Points: 5264
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote FHLH Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 Oct 2022 at 18:20
Originally posted by tigerburnie tigerburnie wrote:

I am not certain, but I am told the reason for the profit short fall prior to covid is because of the re-investment in these projects.

The capital investment in the Granby land and hotel building would not be represented as a profit & loss cost but as an asset on the balance sheet. I suspect it may also be held in a separate company.

Notwithstanding that, hats off to Leicester for being proactive in addressing their parlous state.
"My father told me big men fall just as quick as little ones, if you put a sword through their hearts."
Back to Top
Steve@Mose View Drop Down
World Cup Winner
World Cup Winner
Avatar

Joined: 01 Jun 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 2761
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Steve@Mose Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26 Oct 2022 at 21:56
Slightly off topic but it seemed like it should be in this thread:


Quote
England's professional players are the "experts" who need to be "trusted" with a major say in how the sport is run, according to the players' union.

With more than 50 players still out of work following the collapse of Worcester and Wasps, the Rugby Players' Association [RPA] insist the players are "the answer to growing rugby".

The RPA also believe players need a Collective Bargaining Agreement with the sport's authorities, like in American sports, to safeguard the game's future.

'Players need a say like in the US'

In a wide-ranging interview, former Sale and Northampton lock Christian Day, now head of player affairs at the RPA, told BBC Sport: "We believe rugby is evolving to the point where players have to be part of the discussion, at the table, as signatories to the agreements.

"Not anymore as a consulted group. If they want to buy into the players as the future of the game, get the players sat at the table with you and have them part of the discussion."

Day says rugby union needs to look at other professional leagues around the world, such as the National Rugby League in Australia and the National Basketball Association [NBA] in the United States, where the players are part of a Collective Bargaining Agreement [CBA].

"Professional sports around the world evolve and develop over time," Day explained.

"Rugby union only turned professional in the mid-90s, the American professional sports turned in the 60s.

"It's a bit of a misnomer to compare yourself to American sports but that is what athletes do, they want to look around the world at the global superstars.

"The athletes in those leagues all have a say, they are all at the table, they are all part of a Collective Bargaining Agreement [CBA], and they want to engage."

The CBA at the NBA, as an example, is a 600-page document which includes stipulations such as a minimum wage, while the salary cap is fixed as a percentage of the league's revenue.

"That percentage ranges from the NRL to the American sports but it comes back to a fair deal," Day said.

"What number are we going to set, how are we going to protect our low earners and Academy kids, and at the same time ensure our leading players' welfare is protected and they earn money that represents a fair value?"

'Overpaid players is a misconception'

Day is a firm advocate of a minimum wage, which would assist academy players at the start of their careers, and rails against the suggestion wage inflation has been a major contributor to English rugby's financial crisis.

He also stresses that the vast majority of out-of-work players from Worcester and Wasps will need to return to work in some shape or form as a matter of urgency.

"One of the biggest misconceptions of professional rugby is that everyone is on a six-figure salary," Day said.

"I can strongly refute that. There are countless Premiership players on sub-50k and countless academy players on sub-20k.

"It's not like [Wasps and Worcester] players can just sit there and survive on all the money they've built up over the years; that is not the case.

"A lot of messaging recently has been that players are part of the blame and that players earn too much, and that is the solution: the players should earn less.

"The product the players are putting on the pitch currently is outstanding. We have an incredibly competitive Premiership, high-scoring and close games.

The players deserve some credit here. I would really caution against the players being part of the problem.

"One thing I am particular keen on is a minimum wage - I think that would be a really positive step to protect some of those lower earners.

"If we are talking about academy players, it has to be something that is liveable. If we are going to make young players professional athletes then they need a wage they can live off."

'Game must listen to senior players'

Following the demise of Worcester and Wasps, both the Rugby Football Union and Premiership Rugby have promised a root-and-branch review of the way the sport is governed.

A slimmed-down Premiership, a revamped second-tier, and tighter financial regulation are all potential outcomes from the crisis, while the level of the salary cap, currently at £5m, is under constant review.

"Going forwards now, this is why the players need to be at the table," Day added.

"If we are going play in a capped league, I think the players need to part of the discussions as to where we are going to set the cap and why. What is the metric we are going to use, and how it is going to grow over time?

"I think we need to show a bit of trust in the players that they can come to the table.

"Unless people listen to their ideas we will never know. We should absolutely be asking some of those senior guys what is their perspective."
Back to Top
Camquin View Drop Down
World Cup Winner
World Cup Winner
Avatar

Joined: 01 Jun 2007
Location: Cambridge
Status: Offline
Points: 11156
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Camquin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 Oct 2022 at 09:15
<fx: Brian Moore>
They pay academy players, what sort of message does that send. they should be playing for the love of the game.  After all they are not good enough to play in the premiership.
</fx>

Seriously, there is no more money, if anythin, clubs are alreafy spending more than they can afford. So if you want more equitable pay, the marqeee players will have to take a pay cut. Those marquee players raise the average (mean) wage ito about £100k, though the median is much lower.Giving a false perception.

If you make level three and below amateur, then you cannot have paid academy players playong. So the Premiership would need to have more academy matches, costing more money, which can only come out of the current wage pool.

Sweeney Delenda Est
Back to Top
tigerburnie View Drop Down
World Cup Winner
World Cup Winner


Joined: 10 Jun 2012
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 3646
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote tigerburnie Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 Oct 2022 at 10:23
Marquee players have dropped to one per squad, I understand why they introduced it at the time to put bums on seats having a "world star" in the squad, but somehow that has sort of faded, there are many "stars" that are home grown these days, an example is the number of Tigers academy players currently in the club first team squad and the England squads too. What Moore says about academy players not good enough for the first team shows just how dumb he is, plenty of under 21 players played for England, Johhny Wilkinson probably the most famous, his comments epitomise the outdated dinosaur attitude of those jealous old men who didn't get paid when they played, some seem to inhabit the RFU.
Back to Top
Camquin View Drop Down
World Cup Winner
World Cup Winner
Avatar

Joined: 01 Jun 2007
Location: Cambridge
Status: Offline
Points: 11156
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Camquin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 Oct 2022 at 10:36
To be fair Brian said National One players shoulsnot be paid as they are not good enough for the Premiership. I was twisting his words..


Sweeney Delenda Est
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.04
Copyright ©2001-2021 Web Wiz Ltd.