IMPORTANT Remember to read the rules of the board and abide by them when posting. |
N/E/W division |
Post Reply | Page <1 3456> |
Author | ||
Red over White
World Cup Winner Otley Joined: 22 May 2007 Location: Baildon Status: Offline Points: 340 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
With Wasps being sent to the bottom of the pyramid, there is now a possible vacancy in the Championship.
If it is filled from below there is going to be a ripple effect on the leagues below. If a team is taken from National 1, then Fylde could have the opportunity to go up as the club which has won the most games across the second placed teams from our three leagues. It could also mean Lymm coming into N2N to replace Fylde. If it isn’t filled, expect a lot of shouting from the Championship for the loss of match income. Either way, RFU need to make a decision quickly so clubs can plan, oh pigs might fly!
|
||
Halliford
World Cup Winner Joined: 17 Feb 2010 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 4146 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
|
I have it on good authority that there will be no shuffle upwards. The Championship will continue with 12 teams. The outstanding question is how the Cup will be structured. Now we wait on the London Irish deadline!
|
||
Raider999
World Cup Winner Joined: 18 Jan 2013 Location: Crawley Status: Offline Points: 4430 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
A suggestwould be to bin the cup - Premiership sides are likely to field a lot of Academy players (as in the old Premier Cup) thus leaving a number of championship sides struggling to get 15 out. |
||
RAID ON
|
||
Halliford
World Cup Winner Joined: 17 Feb 2010 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 4146 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
We will probably find out on Monday when Conor O’Shea speaks to the NLR AGM.
|
||
cheshire exile
World Cup Winner Joined: 05 Feb 2009 Status: Offline Points: 2447 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I think this is a gross exaggeration.
|
||
Tyke
British and Irish Lion Joined: 17 Jul 2009 Location: Sussex Status: Offline Points: 286 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
The RFU's principle used to be that teams were not promoted as a result of "vacancies" appearing at a higher level, rather that teams were saved from relegation. Thus Richmond, Esher and then, based on geography, Rochford would remain in their previous leagues. There would be a knock on through the lower leagues. I realise I have used RFU and principle in the same sentence and await a ritual flogging
|
||
If only Webb-Ellis hadn't given them the ball back!
|
||
islander
World Cup Winner Joined: 17 Mar 2010 Location: jersey Status: Offline Points: 7347 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
It's a moot point whether the Wasps' news leaves a vacancy in the Champ. Yes, there was a notion of 13 clubs for next season, leaving 24 in the top 2 tiers; but on the other hand the second tier hasn't had more than 12 clubs for 15 years.
|
||
Camquin
World Cup Winner Joined: 01 Jun 2007 Location: Cambridge Status: Offline Points: 11123 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
The ideal situation for the PRL sides was a five-week tournament. So four pools of six. I am sure they will not do anything until they know what is happening with London Irish - which we should know in two weeks. Changing the size of the Premiership means negotiating with the other European leagues. As I remember, they said the Championship would consist of the 11 Championship sides, the promoted Nat1 side and possibly Wasps and Worcester - so that suggests no lifeline for Richmond. And there has been talk of a Barbarians side in the Cup - though I am not sure where they could play. |
||
Sweeney Delenda Est
|
||
Mark W-J
Coaching staff Joined: 22 May 2007 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 3647 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Sixways
|
||
Raider999
World Cup Winner Joined: 18 Jan 2013 Location: Crawley Status: Offline Points: 4430 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Or they could play all games away |
||
RAID ON
|
||
MikeGC
World Cup Winner Joined: 04 Oct 2014 Location: Burnage Status: Offline Points: 474 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
. exactly what I thought |
||
backrowb
World Cup Winner Joined: 07 Nov 2013 Location: Gods own county Status: Offline Points: 1655 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Hearing a rumour that Lymm, on appeal, go north, Chester west
|
||
Sid James
World Cup Winner Joined: 28 Jun 2013 Location: East Yorkshire Status: Offline Points: 1643 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Where from ? Nothing on any relevant websites etc.
|
||
All Knwoing All Seeing
|
||
backrowb
World Cup Winner Joined: 07 Nov 2013 Location: Gods own county Status: Offline Points: 1655 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
It will come out soon. RFU rejected a 15 team league that both clubs flavoured.
|
||
Sid James
World Cup Winner Joined: 28 Jun 2013 Location: East Yorkshire Status: Offline Points: 1643 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Can Chester appeal the appeal?
|
||
All Knwoing All Seeing
|
||
Robb
World Cup Winner Joined: 24 Jan 2017 Location: South East Status: Offline Points: 1482 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Mmmmm, flavoured clubs! ;)
|
||
Thatbloke
World Cup Winner Joined: 02 Sep 2017 Location: Newport Status: Offline Points: 1716 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
If true it will be the first successful appeal on record - I doubt it's true
|
||
backrowb
World Cup Winner Joined: 07 Nov 2013 Location: Gods own county Status: Offline Points: 1655 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I've heard it from people at both clubs, both with the same version of the story. Went to the very top, and the original decision overturned.
|
||
Thatbloke
World Cup Winner Joined: 02 Sep 2017 Location: Newport Status: Offline Points: 1716 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
"People" in a position of knowledge or "people" just speculating. If the RFU pressed their mileage calculator button and Lymm came out as having the lesser travel then how has that changed? Chester presumably then were deemed to have further to travel so on what grounds can that be overturned? Just seems mega-odd!!
|
||
Thatbloke
World Cup Winner Joined: 02 Sep 2017 Location: Newport Status: Offline Points: 1716 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
The more I think about this "rumour" the more ludicrous it becomes!
"Both clubs favoured a 15 team league" If that is/was an actual suggestion then both clubs are being run by buffoon's (which I'm sure they're not!!) Such a proposal would require 15 extra playing Saturdays to accommodate 1 club "resting" every week - so effectively almost a full year to complete a full league programme - never going to happen!
|
||
Post Reply | Page <1 3456> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |