IMPORTANT Remember to read the rules of the board and abide by them when posting. |
Playing in the Championship Clubs hands? |
Post Reply |
Author | ||
Richard Lowther
Coaching staff Moderator Joined: 19 May 2007 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 6605 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 17 Jul 2024 at 09:38 |
|
With news that Bristol are to play a Premiership game in Cardiff next season and with the already established Premiership club games played at Twickenham and Tottenham's stadium doesn't this just play into the hands of the Championship Clubs arguments about minimum ground capacities?
Why bother having to increase your own ground capacity when you can move any game you think is going to more popular to a bigger stadium? I do wander if this inconsistency was highlighted in the discussion between the RFU, PRL and Championship clubs?
|
||
Paul10
World Cup Winner Joined: 24 Mar 2023 Location: Milton Keynes Status: Offline Points: 754 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I get your point about inconsistencies but think this is more to do with maximum capacity.
|
||
Richard Lowther
Coaching staff Moderator Joined: 19 May 2007 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 6605 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Yes it is to with maximum capacities and that is exactly my point. If a Premiership club thinks their maximum capacity is going to be exceeded they can take the game to a bigger stadium as a one off, yet there appears to be no option for Championship clubs to do the same, they are being forced to increase their capacities, yet no one is saying to Bristol, Quins, Saracens etc, if you think your existing capacity is too small, increase it. |
||
Paul10
World Cup Winner Joined: 24 Mar 2023 Location: Milton Keynes Status: Offline Points: 754 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Yes. I suppose if Prem teams think it's easy to increase capacity...
Rugby has got itself in a proper mess here.
|
||
Halliford
World Cup Winner Joined: 17 Feb 2010 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 4244 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
It's worth noting that the average gates of Quins and Saracens, taking out the games played at big stadia, are less than their current maximum capacity. Expanding their grounds to seat 50,000 would not result in much larger gates.
What worries me is that Community Clubs seeking to increase playing numbers seem to be in direct competition with the Premiership Clubs who are targeting the same audience - males aged 18-30. There are not enough of them to play and also watch matches.
|
||
tigerburnie
World Cup Winner Joined: 10 Jun 2012 Location: Scotland Status: Offline Points: 3795 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
With an average attendance of 15358, Bristol hardly need to move as they cannot sell out their current ground they share with the footy.
|
||
Richard Lowther
Coaching staff Moderator Joined: 19 May 2007 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 6605 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
That's exactly the point. Why would any team increase their capacity to a level which they could not fill, except on an occasional one off basis. Yet the Championship Clubs are being forced to upsize without any guarantee that their gates would grow.
|
||
tigerburnie
World Cup Winner Joined: 10 Jun 2012 Location: Scotland Status: Offline Points: 3795 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Me thinks you are missing a huge point here Richard, the Cartel makes it up as they go along.
|
||
Kimbo
World Cup Winner Joined: 31 May 2007 Location: 'incleh Status: Offline Points: 6425 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Cartel?
As much a cabal as that. Conspiracy, intrigue, machination, and plot - kinda sums them up. |
||
Our Club |
||
Camquin
World Cup Winner Joined: 01 Jun 2007 Location: Cambridge Status: Online Points: 11418 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Be careful, it was decided in the London Welsh case that the Premiership was not operating as a cartel. We certainly would not want to accuse the premiership of acting illegally.
|
||
Sweeney Delenda Est
|
||
WEvans
World Cup Winner Joined: 08 Dec 2016 Location: London Status: Offline Points: 1456 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Premiership clubs move games to bigger grounds so they can package them as special events usually wrapping them up with all sorts of other entertainment to appeal as much to non-rugby fans as to their own supporters. I really see very little to link this to the debate regarding minimum capacity for Championship clubs. Much stronger arguments as far as I am concerned. This one smacks of desperation.
|
||
Richard Lowther
Coaching staff Moderator Joined: 19 May 2007 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 6605 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Why can't they do all this in their own stadiums, which are not are full capacity? Ashton Gate is probably at 60% capacity. We know from past games at Wembley, Twickenham, Tottenham, that clubs are not turning these one off "special events" crowds into regular attendees at their own stadiums. All they seem to do is provide a false picture of a clubs average crowd, which is then used to dictate the minimum capacities for the Championship clubs. |
||
rugbychris
British and Irish Lion Joined: 02 May 2019 Location: London Status: Offline Points: 163 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Seems like a very valid point to me. Why are champ clubs asked to have a minimum stadium capacity of 5000 when they never have a need of that capacity? Yet if prem clubs don't have a stadium capable of hosting expected ticket sales they can debunk to a different location. I guess it doesn't really matter. It's all.just arbitrary.
|
||
Robb
World Cup Winner Joined: 24 Jan 2017 Location: South East Status: Offline Points: 1584 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Unfairly and unreasonably yes, but certainly not illegally.
|
||
WEvans
World Cup Winner Joined: 08 Dec 2016 Location: London Status: Offline Points: 1456 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Presumably they do this as they think having a "separate event" in a different stadium helps with the marketing and ultimately to sell more tickets. Why would they pay the hiring costs otherwise? And whilst I agree these events do little to encourage more regular supporters but are you seriously suggesting that "all they seem to do is to boost average crowds"? Don't you not think the main purpose might just be to boost their finances? I know Premiership club owners aren't particularly financially astute but I would think the main reason they spend thousands to move a game is to do a little more than just boost their average attendance figures in order to dictate minimum capacities! |
||
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |