IMPORTANT Remember to read the rules of the board and abide by them when posting. |
RFU ineptitude part 42 |
Post Reply |
Author | |
gerg_861
World Cup Winner Joined: 11 Jun 2017 Location: Ealing Status: Offline Points: 2631 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 09 Sep 2024 at 23:05 |
Days after announcing a massive giveaway to a cartel that has to funnel 27% of their revenue to the CVC, the RFU has to cut jobs. Again.
My 7 year old couldn't run a business this poorly.
|
|
Paul10
World Cup Winner Joined: 24 Mar 2023 Location: Milton Keynes Status: Offline Points: 705 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Similarly but this isn't all on the rfu.
In this article about TV audiences and sport. Goes the sentence "English club rugby is in an existentially unhealthy place."
|
|
JZSmith
Academy player Joined: 27 Aug 2024 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 20 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Surely we are a long way beyond part 42?
|
|
SK 88
World Cup Winner Joined: 08 Sep 2011 Location: Leicester Status: Offline Points: 591 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
1) PRL pay over 27% of their TV revenue only. The RFU money goes direct and unadulterated to the clubs. 2) If you think this is a "giveaway" you have no idea what it involves or are not looking at it in a good faith way. Attitudes like this are why I think there is no amount of money we should accept for selling our souls. Whatever we agree to people complain it is too much. The RFU now have their total control and draconian game limits. They control the players like the Premiership do the Dual Registered ones. How many posters think that is a healthy thing for the game? 3) The RFU being grossly over staffed at HQ has little bearing on anything, and even if you do think this money should be spent on a different part of rugby (which is fair enough) I don't see why the RFU should employ non-rugby people simply for the sake of it, which appears to be what you are advocating for by comparing rugby expenditure (albeit at a level you don't like) against jobsworths at HQ with non-jobs.
|
|
SK 88
World Cup Winner Joined: 08 Sep 2011 Location: Leicester Status: Offline Points: 591 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
The thing is though is that is fundamentally at the door of the RFU. They chose to spend the first decade of professionalism fighting & suing the top clubs. They've spent the next two decades paying them off and splitting them apart from the other senior clubs to divide and rule and by hook or by crook get their ring fenced franchises they wanted back in 2002 with the "Andrew Plan". The RFU could have recognised that England doesn't suit regions or franchises and took on the clubs by making sure they had a competition format that was inclusive & fair (as far as it can be). The FFR did this, LNR is constituted as it is not just because the French have more solidarity but because FFR only authorised its creation with a more egalitarian format. That was possible from the RFU too and they chose the route of fighting then bribing the clubs. For instance I would agree with probably 80% of the good faith criticisms of the Prem clubs on here, but where I disagree with people who think they have done this in a vacuum. It is always worth remembering that World Rugby fined and threatened to expel the RFU for the crime of allowing TV money from Sky in 1996 to go direct to the clubs, not be washed through the RFU accounts. And that was at a time when the RFU and club relationship was at its probably lowest. Having to fight for your existence does force people into positions they probably wouldn't have adopted otherwise.
|
|
Whaa-Hoo Wilkey
Mini and Juniors Joined: Yesterday Location: Macclesfield Status: Offline Points: 2 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Well, I was, some years ago, an avid poster on this excellent forum, I probably lost interest when Macclesfield tumbled, but he-ho!
Our success after winning our league, in the North West, was rewarded by the RFU by having a spell in Nat 2 West! This is what the Times thought of our reward by the caring RFU!
|
|
May the best team on the day win
|
|
cheshire exile
World Cup Winner Joined: 05 Feb 2009 Status: Offline Points: 2502 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Very well researched piece, except that inland Camborne and Redruth are certainly not at the “pointy end” of Cornwall. But it was an insane decision to put Macc in this division, says someone who lived near Macc for 10 years and comes from the “pointy end”.
Edited by cheshire exile - 11 hours 60 minutes ago at 10:21 |
|
Camquin
World Cup Winner Joined: 01 Jun 2007 Location: Cambridge Status: Offline Points: 11310 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
The Leonard Curtis Report into the financial state of the Premiership has been published. You may want a stiff drink. |
|
Sweeney Delenda Est
|
|
FHLH
World Cup Winner Cambridge Joined: 19 Apr 2009 Location: Cambridge Status: Online Points: 5340 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
FFS ........ £311m debt £30m season losses 7 out of 10 clubs insolvent (Net deficit £16m - £78m surplus £94m deficit) Will be interesting listening to Sweeney at the Coventry match at Cambridge in a few weeks. Will he pick up the Q&A option? But there's hope on the horizon apparently...
Edited by FHLH - 1 minute ago at 22:20 |
|
"My father told me big men fall just as quick as little ones, if you put a sword through their hearts."
|
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |