IMPORTANT Remember to read the rules of the board and abide by them when posting. |
Premiership II plans announced |
Post Reply | Page <1 394041 |
Author | ||
Camquin
World Cup Winner Joined: 01 Jun 2007 Location: Cambridge Status: Online Points: 11408 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
The Championship clubs have one vision, which includes their pledge to reduce the number of DR and loan players in a squad. But
the ten premiership owners have a different view, they want to control
the young players and those players need a finishing school. And the RFU is in hock to the owners, as if they pull out there would not be professional rugby. And
despite the increasing proportion of the RFU's money going to the
professional teams - it all goes into wages. Clubs cannot reduce wages
because the French have more money. So, professional clubs need an owner
willing and able to put several million a year into the team. In order to sell the second tier to the TV companies, they want names the TV executives have heard of. But, because they have never promoted the second tier - man of the current Championship clubs do not have great name recognition.
|
||
Sweeney Delenda Est
|
||
Mark W-J
Coaching staff Joined: 22 May 2007 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 3680 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Beautifully put, Camquin.
|
||
Camquin
World Cup Winner Joined: 01 Jun 2007 Location: Cambridge Status: Online Points: 11408 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Unfortunately, analysing the problem is a lot easier than synthesizing a solution.
|
||
Sweeney Delenda Est
|
||
islander
World Cup Winner Joined: 17 Mar 2010 Location: jersey Status: Online Points: 7585 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Very sporting of you to say that CQ, at the start of a month when your club is one of 2 Champ teams with no competitive rugby scheduled...
|
||
No 7
World Cup Winner Joined: 10 Oct 2011 Location: LONDON Status: Offline Points: 1878 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I visited a Rugby club at the beginning of last season and spoke to a recently retired , high ranking RFU official. I asked him directly did he think that Ealing Trailfinders would ever be promoted to the Premiership . He answered very quickly with a resounding "NO".
|
||
Ambition should be made of sterner stuff.
|
||
gerg_861
World Cup Winner Joined: 11 Jun 2017 Location: Ealing Status: Online Points: 2683 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
It has always been a fix.
|
||
JZSmith
First XV squad Joined: 27 Aug 2024 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 55 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
It would be interested to hear if he thought any club other than the three "brands" who don't currently exist as professional clubs would ever be promoted to the Premiership.
|
||
KnightsBoy
World Cup Winner Joined: 31 Oct 2010 Location: Doncaster Status: Offline Points: 2871 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I think we know the answer to that
|
||
Nat1
First XV regular Joined: 31 Dec 2023 Location: Not given Status: Offline Points: 121 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
[QUOTE=No 7]I visited a Rugby club at the beginning of last season and spoke to a recently retired , high ranking RFU official. I asked him directly did he think that Ealing Trailfinders would ever be promoted to the Premiership . He answered very quickly with a resounding "NO".
And I assume that your next question was 'why not?'. What was his answer to that, as that would likely be more informative?
|
||
Camquin
World Cup Winner Joined: 01 Jun 2007 Location: Cambridge Status: Online Points: 11408 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
The new Football regulator is restricted to Association Football. But only because Football is defined as Association Football. But it would take a single amendment, adding the words "and Rugby Union" on line 15, and the remit would be extended. |
||
Sweeney Delenda Est
|
||
Paul10
World Cup Winner Joined: 24 Mar 2023 Location: Milton Keynes Status: Online Points: 736 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Not sure more blazers is the answer...
|
||
Camquin
World Cup Winner Joined: 01 Jun 2007 Location: Cambridge Status: Online Points: 11408 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
The Football regulator is being created because the FA and the Leagues are not seen to be representing the interests of the clubs or their members and are seen as being in the pockets of a few major owners. It is also specifically tasked to look at parachute payments and restrictive ground conditions. The regulator will also have the power to investigate potential owners to ensure events like Worcester do not occur - because they occur much more often in Soccer. Why would we not want someone fill that role in Rugby. I agree it should be the RFU, just as it should be the FA in their code. |
||
Sweeney Delenda Est
|
||
Robb
World Cup Winner Joined: 24 Jan 2017 Location: South East Status: Offline Points: 1572 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Surprise, surprise. Honestly, the only way they will is either shell out millions on a stadium that isn't needed for the size or, more realistically, just go to court and not be fobbed off again.
|
||
JZSmith
First XV squad Joined: 27 Aug 2024 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 55 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
On paper it seems a sensible idea but then I think of all the other Government regulators that are totally ineffective so I'm unconvinced that a football regulator will make any significant difference. I can't see that being any different in rugby. Remember the outcry when Sweeney appeared before the Parliamentary Select Committee almost two years ago and all the waffle that followed? How much has changed? The new-ish Government has more than enough to deal with without spending time trying to sort out sport.
|
||
Post Reply | Page <1 394041 |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |