IMPORTANT Remember to read the rules of the board and abide by them when posting. |
Schools to offer non-contact rugby to ease 'injury |
Post Reply |
Author | |
Steve@Mose
World Cup Winner Joined: 01 Jun 2007 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 2897 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 21 Oct 2024 at 23:11 |
Schools to offer non-contact rugby to ease 'injury fears'
|
|
Bigmalc
Mini and Juniors Joined: 22 Apr 2024 Location: Bristol Status: Offline Points: 8 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Meanwhile 1000s of children participate in rugby on Sunday morning at their local clubs which over the past 40 years have kept the game alive.
If the school plays rugby fine but team spirit,loyalty and enjoyment are fostered at grass roots level. As usual the RFU are tinkering. Rugby is a game for all but only became popular in public and grammar schools after WW1.I watch games at various levels - are you telling me that players from the SW , Midlands or N are all posh white boys? Happy to enter the debate if you think I'm wrong.
|
|
Malc
|
|
Mark W-J
Coaching staff Joined: 22 May 2007 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 3688 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Rugby's not for everyone. A lot of kids don't enjoy the physical contact, especially when they hit secondary school where some of their classmates could be a foot taller and three stone heavier than them. I know one former Premiership/ international player who didn't want his children playing the sport because of the injuries that he had suffered on the pitch, and two of our current squad (both from the SH) join in the social touch rugby during the summer months, because that's where they developed their love of the game as kids. If this means that more children get to enjoy different formats of the game then I'm all for it.
|
|
rugbychris
British and Irish Lion Joined: 02 May 2019 Location: London Status: Online Points: 163 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
It's a poorly thought out fudge if you ask me. It's touch with far more rules. PE teachers are already overloaded why on earth are they going to spend time learning to teach a new game that has no pathway for players and no form of competition. It doesn't address the issue of falling numbers at community clubs. Touch and Tag are popular in London and I know of hardly any conversions that have come to our club from playing non-contact.
Giving 33 million a year to 10 profligate clubs and then spending next to nothing on a new game that is supposed to create a whole new audience. Are you kidding? I've read the whole report (probably written with chatgpt) and they are going to create a head of schools role and employ 100 part-time managers (1 day a week). Follow the money. It's embarrassing.
|
|
JZSmith
First XV regular Joined: 27 Aug 2024 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 76 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Totally agree Mark. It seems a very sensible way to introduce more kids to the game with some of them no doubt moving to "proper rugby". The others will if nothing else keep themselves fit which can't be a bad thing.
|
|
Camquin
World Cup Winner Joined: 01 Jun 2007 Location: Cambridge Status: Offline Points: 11453 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
One of the factors in the decline of rugby as the leading football code, was mothers petitioning schools to replace it with Soccer due to a fear of injuries - that was in the 1890s. As long as there is a pathway, and pupils who want contact can find it - either in after-school sessions or at a local club - then the more youngsters picking up an oval ball the better.
|
|
Sweeney Delenda Est
|
|
Halliford
World Cup Winner Joined: 17 Feb 2010 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 4245 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
The new proposal simply extends Tag Rugby, which is used already by every Club for the appropriate age groups, to older age groups. The proposal allows boys and girls to do contact rugby where they want to but offers T1 rugby for others. That is a sensible approach which may well lead to boys and girls remaining interested in the sport for longer and switching to contact rugby at some point.
A good step forward!
|
|
sedgley dave
British and Irish Lion Joined: 03 Apr 2011 Location: Prestwich Status: Offline Points: 196 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I have many years of experience here. As a maths teacher who was timetabled for games one afternoon a week, I had to cope (I hope sensitively) with kids who clearly didn't want to be there, mixed in with other kids who loved the rough and tumble of rugby.
We all know of - and probably remember personally - the bullying PE teacher who humiliated the 'weedy' kids who were frightened. I was always against compulsory rugby, in principle, even as a boy myself, when I found no fun in playing against those who were afraid. However, I did find a way of introducing the game to mixed-ability 11-year-olds that most of them loved, and the rest were at least able to tolerate. I would not have liked to try it with boys of 13+. The other side of the picture is that those boys who do love rugby, do so precisely because of the aggressive physical contact, which is not available in any other team game, as far as I know. Many enjoy boxing, which was banned in Manchester schools even as far back as 1966, but thrived in local lads' clubs. Touch rugby, or tag, can be played with boys mixing with girls, and kids with adults. I'm sure it could be fun and great, socially, but as a 'pathway'? I'm not so sure. It would be a shame to deny the strong and self-confident under 12s a chance to experience the real thing, is my final thought. Just enough exposure to decide whether rugby is for them and, if so, to join the school team / local club and play properly. My abiding memory is of a class of little kids squealing with pleasure at their first experience of the game. And of the previous week's class racing round the cross-country course in the hope of being able to join in at the end.
|
|
rugbychris
British and Irish Lion Joined: 02 May 2019 Location: London Status: Online Points: 163 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
T1 is the conclusion of the comprehensive and thorough investigation by the RFU into declining rugby participation at schools and the community. They state that without rugby in schools there will be less rugby in the community and a much weakened professional and national game. They want to stem the flow of trad schools that are no longer playing as well as break into non-traditional schools that have never played.
Their answer to all of the above is a more complex version of touch (T1).
|
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |