![]() |
IMPORTANT Remember to read the rules of the board and abide by them when posting. |
Premiership II plans announced |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 515253 |
Author | ||
Jester10 ![]() World Cup Winner ![]() ![]() Joined: 29 Aug 2012 Location: Reading Status: Offline Points: 1823 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Very fair and balanced post.
|
||
Enjoying life!
|
||
![]() |
||
fatbear ![]() World Cup Winner ![]() ![]() Joined: 13 Sep 2013 Location: Thame Status: Offline Points: 2983 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Richmond and London Scottish also had to restart in the London leagues and work their way back up
Edited by fatbear - Yesterday at 16:19 |
||
![]() |
||
Nat1 ![]() British and Irish Lion ![]() Joined: 31 Dec 2023 Location: Not given Status: Offline Points: 218 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Yes I agree with most of what you say here, and very true that both Richmond and London Scottish also regrouped at the bottom and rose up again (as are London Welsh - currently dominating at Level 5 and soon to be back in the National Leagues). However, the same is not quite true of the Jersey situation. The current Jersey RFC playing at Level 5 (formerly Jersey Athletic) separated from the professional wing (Jersey Reds) back in 2022. They began life at Level 7 in Counties 1 Hampshire and so not right at the bottom of the pyramid. Perhaps the wisest decision ever made was separating the two entities at Jersey prior to the professional setup going kaput. The fact it was propped up for so long with around £1m of taxpayers money (unlike other clubs) is another whole topic/thread, but never sat right with me and begs the question why that ever happened, if at the time the club knew they wouldn't meet the MSC. At the risk of being demonised, I wouldn't lay all of that farce at the door of the RFU (albeit they can be blamed for plenty of other matters!)
Edited by Nat1 - Yesterday at 17:03 |
||
![]() |
||
titans.chris ![]() First XV squad ![]() Joined: 11 Feb 2023 Location: leeds Status: Online Points: 45 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I think that is fair enough Nat1 - Being honest I am not hugely up to date on the Jersey situation but as you say that is a different topic.
Rightly pointed out Fatbear - London Scottish and Richmond, two clubs with a huge history both made to re start at the bottom of the pile. My point was more of a one rule for them one rule for others. Which I think most of us agree with. I am not disparaging any Worcester supporters, this is out of their hands. No one wants to see a Rugby club go bust but the return to the league should be fair and match what has been done to past clubs in similar positions. Unfortunately, I do see a future where Warriors, Wasps and Irish take the place of rightful tier 2 clubs without earning those positions. |
||
![]() |
||
islander ![]() World Cup Winner ![]() Joined: 17 Mar 2010 Location: jersey Status: Offline Points: 7719 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
It's not actually true that Richmond and London Scottish were made to start right from the bottom. They were actually put in a couple of rungs up, I'm fairly sure at level 9, and worked up from there... county leagues went down to level 12 at the time.
London Welsh (Amateur) won Herts Middx 1 in 2017/18, the season after their pro team was liquidated. Not sure what level that was, but not 'starting right from the bottom' either... Jersey RFC had just started a season in Regional 2 SC (level 6) in September 2023 when the Reds went pop. I'm not saying that people criticising the notion that you can parachute a phoenix club straight in at level 2 don't make a very valid point, but nevertheless, I still feel it's important to correct inaccurate comments...
|
||
![]() |
||
Kimbo ![]() World Cup Winner ![]() Joined: 31 May 2007 Location: 'incleh Status: Offline Points: 6511 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I believe, though (and my memory may be playing tricks here?) that my hometown club, Rugby Lions, did have to drop right to the bottom of the Midlands structure.
Indeed, I recall them being made to play a season of friendlies before being permitted to enter the leagues, to ensure that they were fit to play. One rule for...
|
||
Our Club |
||
![]() |
||
fatbear ![]() World Cup Winner ![]() ![]() Joined: 13 Sep 2013 Location: Thame Status: Offline Points: 2983 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
London Scottish restarted at level 10, so not the absolute lowest level at the time but their Wikipedia page states they started at the bottom level ! Not sure about Richmond, but their Wikipedia page also states they started at the bottom of the pyramid. In any case both were in the lower levels of the London/South East regional structure, possibly like London Welsh where their amateur clubs had been ?
|
||
![]() |
||
Camquin ![]() World Cup Winner ![]() ![]() Joined: 01 Jun 2007 Location: Cambridge Status: Offline Points: 11720 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
There was a meeting at Cambridge last night, most of which was confidential. All I can say is that Cambridge intend to remain in the Championship - we believe we can meet the tier II MOS. Nothing for next season is cast in stone yet. Not even the number of clubs in the league. |
||
Sweeney Delenda Est
|
||
![]() |
||
Robb ![]() World Cup Winner ![]() ![]() Joined: 24 Jan 2017 Location: South East Status: Offline Points: 1627 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
London Welsh and Jersey benefitted from their amateur arms being split off as legally separate clubs. (indeed, London Welsh are still officially listed on RFU registrations as London Welsh Amateur) so it could appear that they jumped a few levels when all that happened (at least in LW's case) was that they just took the name of the dissolved pro club (though in Jersey's case it was just use the original name when they entered the leagues before the Reds went down). But I don't think Richmond and LS had amateur arms at the time. Though on Richmond's site it claims they started at Level 9. So perhaps an early precidence of the RFU inserting clubs ahead a few steps in the queue.
|
||
![]() |
||
Camquin ![]() World Cup Winner ![]() ![]() Joined: 01 Jun 2007 Location: Cambridge Status: Offline Points: 11720 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I believe Richmond and LS had amateur teams, but they did not play in the leagues, which were restricted to first XVs. So they moved from being in merit tables to the leagues at an equivalent level.
|
||
Sweeney Delenda Est
|
||
![]() |
||
Breakdown ![]() First XV regular ![]() Joined: 11 Apr 2023 Location: SW London Status: Offline Points: 115 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
That is an accurate picture, Camquin. in 99-00 after going into administration, London Scottish were placed in the London Senior Leagues Merit Table and because they topped that, were placed into Herts/Middx 1 (Tier 9) for 00-01, though I am not sure why they did not go into Counties (Herts/Middx) 2 or 3 at the time [my excuse for ignorance is that I was living in America then], possibly because the third division was not a league but a merit table tier and they were deemed to have already 'won' at H/M 2 level - a tier that only came into existence in 00-01. Richmond's 1st XV played only friendlies in 99-00 and re-entered after a lot of dispute with the RFU in 00-01. If memory serves, they were placed in Herts/Middx 1 because that was where Scottish were and, technically, the two clubs were tied together not just because they shared the ground but also because the professional entities of both had been merged into London Irish (who wore the badges of LS and Rich on the arms of their shirts until at least 2013). Richmond's progression up the tiers was 00-01 Tier 9, followed by 8, 7, 6, 5 in successive seasons then 5,5,5 then 4,4,4,4, then 3,3,3,3 then 2,2,2,2,- 3 - ,2,2,2,- 3,- 2,2. |
||
Broken down. Beyond repair.
|
||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 515253 |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |