![]() |
IMPORTANT Remember to read the rules of the board and abide by them when posting. |
Twickenham |
Post Reply ![]() |
Author | |
Camquin ![]() World Cup Winner ![]() ![]() Joined: 01 Jun 2007 Location: Cambridge Status: Offline Points: 11916 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 20 Mar 2025 at 12:16 |
I am not sure if this has much that we have not heard before, but it shows how much work is needed, and how large a team that needs. I believe that this is all dependent on Richmond council granting a licence for more non-rugby events. |
|
Sweeney Delenda Est
|
|
![]() |
|
Deva Delinquent ![]() World Cup Winner ![]() Joined: 24 May 2017 Location: Chester Status: Offline Points: 2127 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I was reading a similar article on another site earlier today.
Unless they get the council on side, having more than three concerts annually will never go ahead.
|
|
![]() |
|
Richard Lowther ![]() Coaching staff ![]() ![]() Moderator Joined: 19 May 2007 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 6629 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The suggested moves to elsewhere in the country are bluffs to force the council to give in and allow more none rugby events. The cost of building a stadium equivalent to Twickenham would be in the Billions and many years away. How this would be funded is what no one is mentioning.
The irony is they need more non rugby events because they are spending too much on rugby! |
|
![]() |
|
cheshire exile ![]() World Cup Winner ![]() Joined: 05 Feb 2009 Status: Offline Points: 2568 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The RFU senior team are effectively more of an events management company than guardians of a sport.
|
|
![]() |
|
Robb ![]() World Cup Winner ![]() ![]() Joined: 24 Jan 2017 Location: South East Status: Offline Points: 1656 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It's all about the money with them, not about getting as many fans in to watch the highest level of sport as they can. I hope the council block this.
|
|
![]() |
|
kempstonblue ![]() World Cup Winner ![]() ![]() Joined: 20 Jun 2020 Location: Kempston Status: Offline Points: 550 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
If it was Birmingham or Milton Keynes.
Have to be Birmingham for its rails links and airport. Unless Concrete cows and roundabouts are a thing.
|
|
The older I get, the more the RFU leave me confused.
|
|
![]() |
|
SK 88 ![]() World Cup Winner ![]() Joined: 08 Sep 2011 Location: Leicester Status: Offline Points: 607 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Going into it with BCFC and building a stadium on their site right near HS2's new station would be a much better location than Twickenham for me.
Really the RFU should sell a share of Twickenham and spin it off into its own company regardless. As above, the RFU's role is not to be a stadium management company, the IRFU for instance owns a share of the Aviva but does not run it, and that seems much more successful as a model.
|
|
![]() |
|
Richard Lowther ![]() Coaching staff ![]() ![]() Moderator Joined: 19 May 2007 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 6629 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
A substantial part of RFUs income comes from the Stadium. Without it or only a partial share of it that would fall.
What really needs to be cut is the outgoings, and the vast majority of those are to 10 clubs, so the RFU have access to about 50 players per season, a deal which hasn't been particularly successful...
|
|
![]() |
|
SK 88 ![]() World Cup Winner ![]() Joined: 08 Sep 2011 Location: Leicester Status: Offline Points: 607 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Turnover is vanity, profit is sanity. The stadium costs a huge amount to administer and will cost half a billion to redevelop. They already contract out the catering so have to share the profits from corporate hosptality with Compass (or Centreplate or whatever they're called now). Looking at the RFU figures you'll see that they actually have to spend more on "non-rugby" which is principally the stadium than Rugby in most years, it's only under Sweeny that we've had any years where rugby spending outstripped other costs. Broadcasting & Sponsorship (pre-Allianz) would be unaffected which are the main drivers of profit margin, ticketing & banqueting drive a lot of revenue but often at poor margins. Having Twickenham spun off would mean the stadium has to run properly and in its own best interests, with the share of the surplus then transparent and being able to put into the wider game whilst broadcasting & sponsorship produced solely in the pro game stays in the pro game. Compared to our rivals we vastly under invest in professional rugby, and the complaints from the Championship are that we are underspending on pro rugby in their area too. Perhaps if we spent more in the pro game we'd make our best players better and then get the results for England that seems to be the main complaint people really have?
|
|
![]() |
|
cheshire exile ![]() World Cup Winner ![]() Joined: 05 Feb 2009 Status: Offline Points: 2568 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I don’t think the main complaints are about the performance of the England team at all.
They are about the systematic defunding of clubs from the Championship down.
|
|
![]() |
|
JZSmith ![]() British and Irish Lion ![]() Joined: 27 Aug 2024 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 228 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Absolutely.
|
|
![]() |
|
Thatbloke ![]() World Cup Winner ![]() Joined: 02 Sep 2017 Location: Newport Status: Offline Points: 1803 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ditto - for the majority the performances of the England team are no more than a side issue. We are all tied up with trying to run our clubs rather than watching box-kicking and scrum re-set competitions
Edited by Thatbloke - 7 hours 55 minutes ago at 13:04 |
|
![]() |
|
Breakdown ![]() First XV regular ![]() Joined: 11 Apr 2023 Location: SW London Status: Offline Points: 133 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
For each participant that drops out of the game, a whole family becomes less likely to buy a or try to buy a Twickenham ticket. As competition/demand for tickets falls, prices will be harder to sustain. Even a vaguely successful England team could still fail to sell out Twickenham if the only people playing rugby are some private schools and a couple of hundred clubs.
There have been 700 walkovers this season alone. Apart from the loss of income to club bars, there is an incalculable loss of enthusiasm and participation. Which obviously becomes a vicious cycle. |
|
Broken down. Beyond repair.
|
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
|
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |