National League Rugby Discussion Forum Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > League Rugby - www.leaguerugby.co.uk > Regional 1
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Appeal
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

IMPORTANT Remember to read the rules of the board and abide by them when posting.

Appeal

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
Message
Camquin View Drop Down
World Cup Winner
World Cup Winner
Avatar

Joined: 01 Jun 2007
Location: Cambridge
Status: Offline
Points: 11118
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Camquin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 Nov 2021 at 20:44
Contagious, yes, but not the most serious.




Sweeney Delenda Est
Back to Top
Robb View Drop Down
World Cup Winner
World Cup Winner
Avatar

Joined: 24 Jan 2017
Location: South East
Status: Offline
Points: 1475
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Robb Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 Nov 2021 at 23:59
Originally posted by Count Ford Count Ford wrote:

Can anyone confirm if any clubs have had to postpone matches due to Covid and if they have been deducted 5 points? If not it seems a hugely unfair and arbitrary decision against Tring.  

The covid regulation specifically says that matches only get postponed. 
Back to Top
Count Ford View Drop Down
World Cup Winner
World Cup Winner


Joined: 20 May 2017
Location: WA4
Status: Offline
Points: 412
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Count Ford Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 Nov 2021 at 00:18
So Trings available actions were:

a) play the game, but put another club at risk and face potentially a more serious punishment.

b) don't play the game and be deducted 5 points.

This seems a punishment from an organisation that does not have the good of the game at its heart. I know nothing about Tring or have any affiliation to them but quite frankly I'd be appalled if a team in the L8 league I follow was hit with a similar punishment.

And people wonder why Lancashire decided they'd had enough and would try things their own way


Back to Top
@boatyjames View Drop Down
British and Irish Lion
British and Irish Lion
Avatar

Joined: 30 Aug 2016
Location: London
Status: Offline
Points: 177
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote @boatyjames Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 Nov 2021 at 06:56
I think it is harsh on Tring but also harsh on all other clubs in the league. Fact is Tring away is never an easy fixture and one club in the promotion race has been given 5 points instead of playing there!
Back to Top
FEZ ANT PLUCKER View Drop Down
World Cup Winner
World Cup Winner
Avatar

Joined: 28 Apr 2013
Location: Reigate
Status: Offline
Points: 1014
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote FEZ ANT PLUCKER Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 Nov 2021 at 11:49
The rules are the rules and it appears have been interpreted to the letter. It does not mean they are right, fair and reasonable, nor does it mean they cannot be changed or adjusted at some time in the future, by reasonable intelligent thinking rule makers. There seems to be a disparity between circumstances and rules surrounding serious contagious diseases, ie Covid and HFM. There is no doubt that Covid is the worse disease to have affected us all since the plague, however HFM should not be minimalised or downgraded in this context, when welfare of players, care and consideration for others, is a major factor in decisions made at the time.
I am a Dorking supporter and I make this controversial view on the matter which is my opinion only.
Given all the circumstances and having read the 'Appeal' document I think Tring have been treated harshly. It was an Away fixture that Tring failed to fulfil for all the reasons stated and the 5pt deduction IMO is right and justified. Its the other bit I find to be excessive, ie losing their home/return fixture, seemingly as an extra layer of punishment. This facet of the rule seems to me (in a reasonable context) to be excessive punishment, over a decision made by Tring with apparently no malice or aforethought involved. 
As a final note I should mention that Tring have been our 'friends' for many years and I hope that no bitterness or bad feelings emerge as a result of this ruling when we play them in December at the Big Field. I am also conscious that Tring have lost their Christmas home fixture in this process, which would have been for them a financial boost for the club.
I do hope that future consideration and careful thought is given by the powers that be to this rule should the same circumstances ever happen again. 
Fezantplucker
Back to Top
Lord_Kitchener View Drop Down
First XV regular
First XV regular
Avatar

Joined: 25 Jan 2017
Location: London
Status: Offline
Points: 149
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Lord_Kitchener Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 Nov 2021 at 13:50
Whilst rules are rules, none cater for the deduction of a 5 point penalty. This is at the discretion of the League Secretary.

His decision was based on the form of consistency and setting an example based on historic precedent.

Sadly we are not in a "normal" season. Based on the specific situation, a walkover win to the oppo and loss of home advantage for the return were sufficient. a 5 point penalty suspended for 2 years would have also tied in to this.

It's the same with CS Stags. What did the 5 point penalty achieve?
Back to Top
dave2dave View Drop Down
First XV regular
First XV regular


Joined: 26 Mar 2018
Location: Witzend
Status: Offline
Points: 83
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote dave2dave Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 Nov 2021 at 16:03
using a sledge hammer to crack a walnut here.
As Count Ford said 
So Trings available actions were:

a) play the game, but put another club at risk and face potentially a more serious punishment.

b) don't play the game and be deducted 5 points. 
correct.

Please advsie for next time the correct answer 
what was the c) your club would have done to be fair to all parties involved
Back to Top
Thunderbird View Drop Down
British and Irish Lion
British and Irish Lion
Avatar

Joined: 11 Sep 2013
Location: East Anglia
Status: Offline
Points: 171
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Thunderbird Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 Nov 2021 at 16:19
Having followed this thread from the start. All so having dealt with disciplinary matters at CB and National league level. I would always contact the CB secretary or National league secretary for guidance before making any meaningful decision. Basically put the ball in their court. 

I have actually had HFM and would not wish it on anyone. All the hard skin came off my hands and feet, to swallow anything was like swallowing acid. I am also old enough to remember when scrum pox was rife
and was also very contagious, referees would stop players playing if it was spotted. 
Back to Top
Camquin View Drop Down
World Cup Winner
World Cup Winner
Avatar

Joined: 01 Jun 2007
Location: Cambridge
Status: Offline
Points: 11118
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Camquin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 Nov 2021 at 17:11
The original decision may well be harsh.
However, given there is no relegation this season, the five point penalty is entirely nominal.
So what was the upside to the appeal?
Sweeney Delenda Est
Back to Top
Robb View Drop Down
World Cup Winner
World Cup Winner
Avatar

Joined: 24 Jan 2017
Location: South East
Status: Offline
Points: 1475
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Robb Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 Nov 2021 at 16:05
Originally posted by Camquin Camquin wrote:

The original decision may well be harsh.
However, given there is no relegation this season, the five point penalty is entirely nominal.
So what was the upside to the appeal?

It was early in the season and with more promotion spots up for grabs, reasonable to take consideration of the need for points.
Back to Top
dave2dave View Drop Down
First XV regular
First XV regular


Joined: 26 Mar 2018
Location: Witzend
Status: Offline
Points: 83
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote dave2dave Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26 Nov 2021 at 18:10
see intelligence on westcliff vs Guernsey

On the last game. I note that Westcliff borrowed 4 players for Guernsey last week to play the game. Can somebody shed some light on this and tell me how does that work ?  

shows how wrong  / right TRING got it , should have selected 4  or 5 Dorking players and played on, but then comes the problem who pays for what, pay, damages, if loan player get career ending injury et el.




  
Back to Top
Raider999 View Drop Down
World Cup Winner
World Cup Winner


Joined: 18 Jan 2013
Location: Crawley
Status: Offline
Points: 4429
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Raider999 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26 Nov 2021 at 18:55
Originally posted by dave2dave dave2dave wrote:

see intelligence on westcliff vs Guernsey

<span style=": rgb251, 251, 253;">On the last game. I note that Westcliff borrowed 4 players for Guernsey last week to play the game. Can somebody shed some light on this and tell me how does that work ?  </span>

shows how wrong  / right TRING got it , should have selected 4  or 5 Dorking players and played on, but then comes the problem who pays for what, pay, damages, if loan player get career ending injury et el.




  


Saw that, not sure if they borrowed them from Guernsey or other clubs to play at Guernsey.

Report on Westcliff website just said 4 players made their debut - no other information.

I would imagine Westcliff's insurance would have covered any problems of that nature.
RAID ON
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.04
Copyright ©2001-2021 Web Wiz Ltd.