IMPORTANT Remember to read the rules of the board and abide by them when posting. |
Premiership II plans announced |
Post Reply | Page <1 3637383940 42> |
Author | |||
Paul10
World Cup Winner Joined: 24 Mar 2023 Location: Milton Keynes Status: Offline Points: 758 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Ampthill has several pitches.
The 1st team pitch is the only flat one. The other pitches have floodlights and are close to the club house so presumably straight forward for an electricity supply. |
|||
Camquin
World Cup Winner Joined: 01 Jun 2007 Location: Cambridge Status: Offline Points: 11453 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
But are often only suitable for water polo. The upper pitches are much better - and playable in all weathers. Cambridge always seems to visit in the middle of a named storm. Edited by Camquin - 02 Oct 2024 at 14:39 |
|||
Sweeney Delenda Est
|
|||
gerg_861
World Cup Winner Joined: 11 Jun 2017 Location: Ealing Status: Offline Points: 2698 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I will repeat what I have said many times here: The RFU should restore some of the removed funding, and designate it for capital expenditures (e.g. stands, pitch improvements). Honestly, that should have been the case when each team was getting £625k/annum. A basic, 50 seat covered stand can be had for £20k, and there are plenty of clubs with no covered seats at all.
|
|||
islander
World Cup Winner Joined: 17 Mar 2010 Location: jersey Status: Offline Points: 7609 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Some seem to think that the Champ is being reconstituted, with existing clubs having to apply to be in it. But that’s not the case, is it? I thought it was an expansion thing with an invitation to teams who might want to claim the 13th/14th places…
There’s an article in today’s Times on this - refers to various stumbling blocks such as both Wasps & Wuss being under same ownership, the need to pay creditors (including agents) etc
|
|||
Kimbo
World Cup Winner Joined: 31 May 2007 Location: 'incleh Status: Offline Points: 6435 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
No, it's because the pitch is about seven miles from the nearest civilisation 😉 Seriously though, it would seem that Ampthill will have to do a lot of groundwork and building work to comply.
|
|||
Our Club |
|||
Camquin
World Cup Winner Joined: 01 Jun 2007 Location: Cambridge Status: Offline Points: 11453 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Ampthill did have a plan to sell the ground and move about a mile to a new site - which would be able to have a main pitch next to the clubhouse and possibly lights. But it was all set to go in 2020. But, life happened. |
|||
Sweeney Delenda Est
|
|||
Nat1
First XV regular Joined: 31 Dec 2023 Location: Not given Status: Offline Points: 145 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I'm afraid not. From what I have read it looks to me that whilst all existing Champ clubs would in principle have the right to be part of Prem 2 next season (save for promotion/relegation) that would ONLY be the case if they could evidence that they meet the MOS criteria, with regards infrastructure, media facilities, stand(s), existing and potential expanded capacity numbers etc. The last two sentences of the extract below appear to confirm this, 'validate and confirm MOS...in order to participate': To: Universities, Colleges and RFU Member Clubs 30th September 2024 Tier 2 - INVITATION TO SUBMIT A FORMAL EXPRESSION OF INTEREST At its September 2024 meeting the RFU Council approved the mechanism for entry for additional teams into the Tier 2 (currently known as the Championship) league from 2025/26. Entry will be via a tender process. The process for the existing 12 Championship clubs to validate and evidence their ability to meet the ‘Essential’ minimum operating standards, and other matters, in order to participate in the new Tier 2 league, is coming to the end of the validation. For at least a third if not half of existing Champ clubs this will not be feasible, whether that be due to financial, space, infrastructure, location constraints. At the risk of sounding cynical, I'd suggest that the RFU are well aware of that fact, hence opening the door for aspiring Nat 1/University clubs who can meet the requirements, along with the likes of Worcester and /or Wasps etc if resurrected. For the sake of those existing Champ clubs who are set to be left out in the cold, and their many thousands of fans across the country, I hope that I'm wrong.
Edited by Nat1 - 02 Oct 2024 at 20:51 |
|||
islander
World Cup Winner Joined: 17 Mar 2010 Location: jersey Status: Offline Points: 7609 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
That's your way of reading it Nat 1, with your choice of bolded words. I read it differently...
At its September 2024 meeting the RFU Council approved the mechanism for entry for additional teams into the Tier 2 (currently known as the Championship) league from 2025/26. Entry will be via a tender process Have highlighted 'additional' because I sense the existing 12 (apart from possibly the winners going up and the losers going down, with both being replaced) would get places... Hopefully someone can clarify which of these interpretations is correct.
|
|||
Nat1
First XV regular Joined: 31 Dec 2023 Location: Not given Status: Offline Points: 145 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
'The process for the existing 12 Championship clubs to validate and evidence their ability to meet the ‘Essential’ minimum operating standards, and other matters, in order to participate in the new Tier 2 league, is coming to the end of the validation.' This paragraph, bolded or not, is clear and definitive. 'In order to participate' is black and white. What may be more ambiguous to most of us, including me, is how strict/demanding the MOS will be that the RFU decide to enforce, and what the subsequent effect on existing Champ clubs will be. Ultimately, we will have to wait and see. |
|||
Rothman2
World Cup Winner Rotherham Joined: 20 Jan 2010 Location: Location Status: Offline Points: 11577 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Trying to catch up in my reading and noticed this on the BBC site regarding Worcester. Apologies if it has already been published on this or another thread: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-union/articles/cn0erl5n554o |
|||
gerg_861
World Cup Winner Joined: 11 Jun 2017 Location: Ealing Status: Offline Points: 2698 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I am pretty sure that everyone got invited. News on prem 2 in the Rugby Journal today, four page article. Very good. Lots of info about minimum standards and the tender process. Also lots on the Champ clubs podcast. Both confirm that some clubs in the league do not meet current standards. Final decision on prem 2 constituents to be taken by Tier 2 board, and NOT the RFU.
|
|||
gerg_861
World Cup Winner Joined: 11 Jun 2017 Location: Ealing Status: Offline Points: 2698 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Tier 2 board apparently is also backing the limits on dual registered players. That is an EXCELLENT negotiation tactic with the PRL. If they want game time for their young players, then provide some cash.
|
|||
Kimbo
World Cup Winner Joined: 31 May 2007 Location: 'incleh Status: Offline Points: 6435 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
It's a very good article, with a lot of stand-out content.
One of the best bits comes from Nick Johnston, where he says on the subject of parachute payments: (I paraphrase) 'They should be put in an account and used to pay those boys and girls that would otherwise lose their jobs due to relegation from the Prem. If they don't want to do that, then we'll just put a wage cap in place'. Bravo.
|
|||
Our Club |
|||
ParkBench
British and Irish Lion Joined: 19 Oct 2013 Location: Richmond Status: Offline Points: 154 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Article just in The Times by Alex Lowe saying that London Irish have also applied to join the jamboree. Expression of interest by their preferred bidders of the moment - Hokulani Ltd.
The stitch up gathers momentum. The RFU think it a good idea that clubs that have survived the last few years have to submit three years worth of accounts yet waive that requirement rather than adding further proofs and steps for the 3 clubs that can’t provide those accounts.
|
|||
islander
World Cup Winner Joined: 17 Mar 2010 Location: jersey Status: Offline Points: 7609 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Those interested should check out the most recent episode of the Champ Clubs Podcast, in which Bedford COO Gareth Alred gives his take on some of the issues about expansion. Interesting that he appears to indicate no team is likely to be relegated from the Champ this season, so if all the existing clubs pass the minimum standards, which again seems to most likely outcome, and the Nat 1 winners come up, my maths suggests there would only be one vacancy left in order to get to the increased quota of 14 clubs.
Get the pod here - https://linktr.ee/Champclubspod
Edited by islander - 09 Oct 2024 at 14:29 |
|||
Wigwam
World Cup Winner Joined: 23 Feb 2012 Location: The sunny south Status: Offline Points: 1168 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Nothing thrives in stagnate water
Same with stagnate rugby leagues
|
|||
Pace Power Perfection
|
|||
gerg_861
World Cup Winner Joined: 11 Jun 2017 Location: Ealing Status: Offline Points: 2698 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
https://www.championshiprugby.co.uk/follow/news-media/minimum-standards-criteria
Total screw job. Need to have planning permission and funding before eligible for promotion.
|
|||
Se7en
World Cup Winner Joined: 18 Apr 2023 Location: Not given Status: Offline Points: 520 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
That's not quite accurate. Alred says around the 23.50 mins mark that there is the possibility that some (unnamed) current Champ clubs that may not meet the MOS criteria. He goes on to say, quite rightly, that they have had enough time to get their houses in order to ensue that they do, which is a fair point if Level 2 does want to run more professionally. A decent, balanced overview from a man in the know who recognises that change is coming, and is needed.
Edited by Se7en - 09 Oct 2024 at 21:12 |
|||
cheshire exile
World Cup Winner Joined: 05 Feb 2009 Status: Offline Points: 2521 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Enough time? Remind us when the “minimum criteria” were published.
|
|||
Se7en
World Cup Winner Joined: 18 Apr 2023 Location: Not given Status: Offline Points: 520 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
The Champ clubs and their representatives have been having regular meetings with the RFU for months, I believe at least quarterly but I'm not 100% on that. I'm not privy to the exact date the MOS were formalised and published, but I'd suggest Alred and his counterparts at the other clubs are. Perhaps someone close to the leadership team at Bedford Blues or one of the other clubs knows? In essence, none of what the clubs are being asked to evidence now should come as a suprise this far down the line, especially if they'd decided to be proactive in finding out. Whether the clubs agree or can comply with them is a different matter obviously. The tone of those (very knowledgeable and experienced) contributors on the podcast is actually one of recognition and understanding that changes need to be put in place, and should be a good thing for bringing up the Champ to align more to a professional league and setup. The idea being that this will inevitably increase its marketability to investers and media parties, which would in turn create noteworthy revenue and ensure the survival and development of Tier 2 into the future.
Edited by Se7en - 10 Oct 2024 at 08:01 |
|||
Post Reply | Page <1 3637383940 42> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |