Blaydon deduction
Printed From: National League Rugby Discussion Forum
Category: League Rugby - www.leaguerugby.co.uk
Forum Name: National 2
Forum Description: Discuss the 42 clubs in the fourth level of the English game.
URL: http://www.leaguerugby.co.uk/forum_posts.asp?TID=19506
Printed Date: 19 Sep 2024 at 03:50
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Blaydon deduction
Posted By: Red over White
Subject: Blaydon deduction
Date Posted: 04 Dec 2022 at 16:12
|
Anybody know the reason why Blaydon have had a 5-point deduction? |
Replies:
Posted By: kingsheathlad
Date Posted: 04 Dec 2022 at 16:50
|
Huddersfield and Harrogate also with 5 point deductions. ------------- Cauliflower ear. |
Posted By: Thatbloke
Date Posted: 04 Dec 2022 at 17:13
| Huddersfield and Harrogate failed to raise a team late last season - deduction carried over to 22/23. Can't help you with Blaydon! |
Posted By: 'Hopper
Date Posted: 04 Dec 2022 at 17:41
|
I was told yesterday that it was a DR issue at the Fylde game. ------------- What if the Hokey Kokey really IS what it's all about? |
Posted By: Camquin
Date Posted: 04 Dec 2022 at 17:48
|
Seems to have occurred about a month ago - there is a reference to it in the update for week 11 as happening the previous month. But only appeared in the table last week. But I cannot see a reference to what it was for. Deductions are usually for not having enough front-row players, or having an unregistered player. ------------- Sweeney Delenda Est |
Posted By: Sedge Tiger
Date Posted: 04 Dec 2022 at 18:09
|
I think you will find it was the game against Sheffield RUFC recently where they used some unregistered Newcastle Falcons players. It came up in the pre match lunch speech by the Sheffield Chairman yesterday. All the best ST ------------- Give him one with handles on |
Posted By: Rabbie Burns
Date Posted: 04 Dec 2022 at 18:16
|
I thought that was not possible with GMS unless of course the players didn’t match the names ------------- So many Christians not enough Lions |
Posted By: 'Hopper
Date Posted: 04 Dec 2022 at 18:31
The Blaydon Chairman mentioned the Fylde game. ------------- What if the Hokey Kokey really IS what it's all about? |
Sedge Tiger wrote:Posted By: Sedge Tiger
Date Posted: 04 Dec 2022 at 18:42
|
Sorry Hopper, My apologies as you were not at Park Lane yesterday. 😂😂Maybe (The Sheffield RUFC Chairman) made a speech about his club being a victim of unfair play to get some sympathy. Maybe I had too many G&Ts!!! At the end of the day I am just adding a point someone ( allegedly) directly effected told me. Enjoy your night. All the best ST
------------- Give him one with handles on |
Posted By: Red over White
Date Posted: 05 Dec 2022 at 14:03
|
Thanks all |
Posted By: sedgley dave
Date Posted: 06 Dec 2022 at 17:20
| So should we now expect Stourbridge to suffer a deduction? And how do they decide whether the points sanction applies to this season, or next, as in the cases of Harrogate and Huddersfield? |
Posted By: Camquin
Date Posted: 06 Dec 2022 at 17:49
|
As there is relegation, I would expect any deduction to apply this season. Though the RFU can choose to suspect part of the deduction, the suspended part to apply if the offence is repeated. ------------- Sweeney Delenda Est |
Posted By: Thatbloke
Date Posted: 06 Dec 2022 at 19:28
|
Harrogate & Hudds were only carried over to this season as they would have had no effect last. I see no reason why Stour should expect anything other than a 5 point deduction immediately (or when ratified by RFU which seems to take about 4 weeks but they might be busy on other matters!?) Interesting to see if they can get a side out this weekend - would seem to depend on other clubs lending them players - farcical in my opinion!
|
Posted By: NeilSKN
Date Posted: 08 Dec 2022 at 22:47
| The post starts off about a possible Blaydon deduction and ends mentioning a Stourbridge deduction. Different leagues! Can someone clarify what’s going on. |
Posted By: Camquin
Date Posted: 09 Dec 2022 at 09:24
|
The Blaydon deduction has been confirmed, and we have clarified that it was for an unregistered player. They borrowed a Newcastle loan player without getting the paperwork correct. Which has led to people speculating on the possible Stourbridge deduction - for not fulfilling their match last week - which is still working its way through the system. Caused because they could not borrow players from their usual sources, Worcester and Wasps. I would not expect threads on this board to stay on topic. ------------- Sweeney Delenda Est |