Print Page | Close Window

Pitch Size - simple question?

Printed From: National League Rugby Discussion Forum
Category: League Rugby - www.leaguerugby.co.uk
Forum Name: Clubhouse chat
Forum Description: For rugby related posts that fit nowhere else.. When you're ready Sandra.
URL: http://www.leaguerugby.co.uk/forum_posts.asp?TID=18416
Printed Date: 26 Jun 2024 at 07:15
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Pitch Size - simple question?
Posted By: Bunkermentality
Subject: Pitch Size - simple question?
Date Posted: 27 May 2020 at 13:05
I was recently asked a seemingly simple question "what are the dimensions of a rugby pitch?" I checked the RFU regulations and was only able to find two mentions

13.7.1 It is the responsibility of the home Club to ensure the availability of a pitch and to correctly and clearly mark its pitch. 
13.7.2 Where an Artificial Pitch is to be used the Club where the pitch is situated must comply with World Rugby Regulation 22.

The World Rugby regulations  https://laws.worldrugby.org/?law=1" rel="nofollow - https://laws.worldrugby.org/?law=1  are quite clear on the pitch dimensions but the RFU Regulations do not reference these. Does anyone know how the World Rugby Regulations apply to pitch sizes in the RFU competitions? Does the RFU permit size variations?



Replies:
Posted By: Halliford
Date Posted: 27 May 2020 at 13:28
You'll find in the Definitions section of the RFU Regulations a definition for Laws of the Game which refers to those issues by World Rugby, unless amended by trials within the RFU. So the Laws as published by World Rugby are those which should be followed and Law 1 defines pitch sizes.

Esher used to have a pitch which was maximum size with the maximum dead-ball areas, however we have reduced those in size to give space for coaches to stand and get angry with their team's performance.


Posted By: KnightsBoy
Date Posted: 27 May 2020 at 13:52
https://laws.worldrugby.org/?law=1&language=EN%20" rel="nofollow - https://laws.worldrugby.org/?law=1&language=EN

Hope this helps


Posted By: Bunkermentality
Date Posted: 27 May 2020 at 14:05
Yes World Rugby's law one is very clear. What was less clear is where it states that the RFU abide by World Rugby laws and @Halliford led me to this in the RFU Definitions. Common sense also strongly suggested that the RFU must adhere to World Rugby laws.


Posted By: Camquin
Date Posted: 27 May 2020 at 14:12
NCA have minimums set out in the https://ncarugby.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/admin-aug-2019.pdf" rel="nofollow - admin instructions section 5.1

5.1 Pitches

All pitches used for National League games must conform to the standards defined in the World Rugby Laws section

1. These Laws do not define a minimum size for a pitch. However,at the NCA AGM on 5thJune 2016 the Clubs agreed that the following minimum sizes should apply

 - Try line to try line –90 metres
 - Touch line to touch line –65metres
 - Try line to dead ball line –5 metres

Artificial pitches  can  be  used.  However, these  must  comply  with  World  Rugby  Regulation  22  and  have  the appropriate and current certificates.



-------------
Sweeney Delenda Est


Posted By: Camquin
Date Posted: 27 May 2020 at 14:15
Haliford - while the main pitch is commendable, even if the dead ball areas are not quite the maximum size, the Cavaliers pitch is comically short. 


-------------
Sweeney Delenda Est


Posted By: Camquin
Date Posted: 27 May 2020 at 14:21
Also the minimums are a new addition to the laws.
There are not in my 2017 printed copy and as I recall were introduced for International matches last season. They now seem to apply to all competitions - unless there is permission from the local union.


-------------
Sweeney Delenda Est


Posted By: Bunkermentality
Date Posted: 27 May 2020 at 14:38
@Camquin reignites my earlier confusion. The latest Word Rugby law states that the pitch width must be between 68 - 70m. But does the RFU permit any variation from this?


Posted By: Robb
Date Posted: 27 May 2020 at 15:22
If you want a small pitch, go to Deal & Betteshanger. The ends are sandwidged between the wall of an army barracks and a school playing field fence, it's probably minimum size if not smaller.


Posted By: oneagainstthehead
Date Posted: 27 May 2020 at 15:47
Originally posted by Robb Robb wrote:

If you want a small pitch, go to Deal & Betteshanger. The ends are sandwidged between the wall of an army barracks and a school playing field fence, it's probably minimum size if not smaller.
Check it out on Google Maps satellite view. Probably no more than 83-85 metres.


-------------
Speak softly, but carry a big stick.


Posted By: PiffPaff
Date Posted: 27 May 2020 at 16:02
Seem to recall West Leeds RUFC (not West Park Leeds) had in-goals of 2 metres

-------------
Crouch, Bind, Tweet!


Posted By: Oldnknackered
Date Posted: 27 May 2020 at 17:08
Go to Vale of Lune, their DB areas are HUGE.... 


Posted By: marigold
Date Posted: 27 May 2020 at 17:10
Clifton largest dead ball areas in country?


Posted By: Thatbloke
Date Posted: 27 May 2020 at 18:19
I wonder how many of the soccer grounds being used in the Premiership meet these minimum requirements? There is no space at all behind the goal posts at virtually all soccer grounds so dead ball lines tend to be taken as the "goal lines" used for football with the try lines moving closer to one another - are these the 90 metres minimum apart? Even if not I guess this is OK so long as you can fill the ground and make money


Posted By: Raider999
Date Posted: 27 May 2020 at 18:38
Originally posted by Thatbloke Thatbloke wrote:

I wonder how many of the soccer grounds being used in the Premiership meet these minimum requirements? There is no space at all behind the goal posts at virtually all soccer grounds so dead ball lines tend to be taken as the "goal lines" used for football with the try lines moving closer to one another - are these the 90 metres minimum apart? Even if not I guess this is OK so long as you can fill the ground and make money



I recall Leicester Tigers ground not being used in the 2015 World Cup because it was not big enough to meet WRU standards.

-------------
RAID ON


Posted By: FHLH
Date Posted: 27 May 2020 at 18:48
I marked out a pitch in 1986 as:

Dead Ball 22m
Try 22m
Half way 30m
Half way 30m
Try 22m
Dead ball 22m

Width 70m

Playing area 104m, dead ball area 44m - great play inside dead ball areas, players had to read up on dead ball area laws

It was great fun to play on


-------------
"My father told me big men fall just as quick as little ones, if you put a sword through their hearts."


Posted By: Robb
Date Posted: 27 May 2020 at 22:44
Originally posted by Thatbloke Thatbloke wrote:

I wonder how many of the soccer grounds being used in the Premiership meet these minimum requirements? There is no space at all behind the goal posts at virtually all soccer grounds so dead ball lines tend to be taken as the "goal lines" used for football with the try lines moving closer to one another - are these the 90 metres minimum apart? Even if not I guess this is OK so long as you can fill the ground and make money

Well I'd say the Madjeski is/was borderline. 


Posted By: Camquin
Date Posted: 28 May 2020 at 08:40
According to WIkipedia the madstad is 106m x 68m.
I assume that is dead ball to deadball so 96x68 goal line to goal line and 5m dead ball. 
However, I do not believe it has a 5m gap to the barriers.
 


-------------
Sweeney Delenda Est


Posted By: Halliford
Date Posted: 28 May 2020 at 09:29
Originally posted by Camquin Camquin wrote:

Haliford - while the main pitch is commendable, even if the dead ball areas are not quite the maximum size, the Cavaliers pitch is comically short. 

I presume you mean our Cardinals pitch, behind the stand. Yes, the two pitches there are small, but we have two other full-size pitches. We only use the Cardinals pitch for 2nd XV matches against teams who like to run the ball a lot and who might beat us by doing that!


Posted By: Camquin
Date Posted: 28 May 2020 at 10:05
That's the one.
Cardinals makes more sense given how close you are to Hampton court.
Don't know why I thought they were Cavaliers.
I do not believe the pitch size stopped the Wanderers from running rings round you.


-------------
Sweeney Delenda Est


Posted By: Bunkermentality
Date Posted: 28 May 2020 at 14:43
Originally posted by Camquin Camquin wrote:

NCA have minimums set out in the https://ncarugby.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/admin-aug-2019.pdf" rel="nofollow - admin instructions section 5.1

5.1 Pitches 
All pitches used for National League games must conform to the standards defined in the World Rugby Laws section 
1. These Laws do not define a minimum size for a pitch. However,at the NCA AGM on 5thJune 2016 the Clubs agreed that the following minimum sizes should apply
 - Touch line to touch line – 65metres

The latest World Rugby law #1 now defines minimum sizes. For example width is 68 - 70m so how does this affect the NCA agreed minimum of 65 metres and does the new minimum of 68m apply to all pitches used for RFU competitions?


Posted By: Halliford
Date Posted: 29 May 2020 at 12:47
Originally posted by Camquin Camquin wrote:

That's the one.
Cardinals makes more sense given how close you are to Hampton court.
Don't know why I thought they were Cavaliers.
I do not believe the pitch size stopped the Wanderers from running rings round you.

Cardinals is nothing to do with Hampton Court, as far as I am aware. Esher always had as junior teams Cardinals, Abbots,Priors and Friars. Sadly only the first two of those are now running, a long way from the 1960s when with 13 teams on a Saturday we were allegedly the largest Club in England. 

We are always happy to accommodate opposition who run rings around our second team - but only once!



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2021 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net